search for: lhecking

...t server's password: Connection to server closed by remote host. lost connection $ scp -v vsftpd-0.9.2.tar.gz user at server:/usr/local/src/misc/ftp SH_2.9.9p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config debug1: Reading configuration data /home/lhecking/.ssh/config debug1: Seeding random number generator debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be trusted. debug1: restore_uid debug1: ssh_connect: getuid 640 geteuid 0 anon 1 debug1: Connecting to server [192.168.1.1] port 22. debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 640/15 (e=0) debug1...

We're trying to migrate RHEL3 and CentOS4 based samba servers over to CentOS5, but it's a bleeding disaster. We cannot get it to work reliably with any version of CentOS5, i386 or x86_64, the included 3.0.x version of samba or 3.4.x/3.5.x compiled from source. The symptoms are: read access is extremely slow, write access seems to work in principle (e.g. creating a zeros-sized file on

> Nice to know I'm not the only one that tries to use system facilities > the way they were intended to work and has problems. Maybe if you touch > the bug report so they know I'm not the only one the folks will look and > elevate to RH bug just like they used to do? I was surprised that > "crash" didn't get any attention. While only vaguely related to this

Am 18.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb lhecking at users.sourceforge.net: > >> Maybe so, but still a side issue. Openssl 0.9.8e was recently updated. >> Some change in this update has broken something. I would like to understand >> what, and so ought the package maintainers. C5 isn't EOL until March 2017. > > rpm...

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 06.05.2015 um 13:04 schrieb lhecking at users.sourceforge.net: >> >>> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates >>> outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely >>> compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or >>> Criti...

> You have several hundred more Critical or Important security updates > outstanding. If that box touches the Internet in any way, it is likely > compromised. Just in the last 6 months there are 21 Important or > Critical updates. That is an important qualifier: *If* that box touches the Internet in any way. Although one might add that attacks on the LAN can be nastier since there

Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer with excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. The weird thing is that the number of these operations increases over time. I have an mrtg graph (which I didn't

CentOS 5.3 New updates available used to be flagged in the (Gnome) desktop notification area, but I don't get them any longer. What could be the problem? yum-updatesd is set up with the default configuration (dbus), and on the machines I changed the notification to email, I do indeed receive these emails.

It seems it's not possible to monitor kvm virtual image network interfaces via SNMP. MRTG's cfgmaker says ### The following interface is commented out because: ### * has no ifSpeed property and other monitors are consistently reporting that vm's interfaces are exceeding traffic thresholds (even on lo ...). Which is no surprise if the threshold is zero. I found a hint on some

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Lars Hecking <lhecking at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > ?Possibly. Or possibly not. On a closely related topic, can you comment on > ?whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? > ?They seem to be fundamentally broken. > I don't think you need it anymore with F...

We're experiencing problems with some legacy software when it comes to NFS access. Even though files are visible in a terminal and can be accessed with standard shell tools and vi, this software typically complains that the files are empty or not syntactically correct. The NFS filesystems in question are 8TB+ XFS filesystems mounted with

Does anyone here know which CentOS release added support for 8086:1521, some I350 class device? We cannot get it to work under 5.4/igb driver version 1.3.16-k2. There must have been some major updates since, 5.8 driver is 3.0.6-k2-2 and current is 3.3.6.

I'm trying to use rysnc to back up some directories on a CentOS6 machine that uses selinux in enforcing mode. Most files didn't transfer, so I tried the example from rsync_selinux(8): Allow rsync servers to read the /var/rsync directory by adding the pub- lic_content_t file type to the directory and by restoring the file type. semanage fcontext -a -t

I'm trying to build a bugfixed anaconda package for 5.3 x84_64, but there are some fairly basic failures, like pkg-config .pc files not being found. When I modify the spec file accordingly, linking fails because installed libraries are not found. $ rpmbuild -ba anaconda.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25019 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG +

I'm going to retire an old RHEL3 server and move the services to CentOS5. In particular, the web server is giving me a headache. On the old box, there's a hacked-up httpd/mod_jk/tomcat setup, and CentOS is perfect for the new box because the required components are included and the whole setup "just works" straight from installation. There seems to be surprisingly little

I'm following this thread here http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23749&forum=38 to build an rpm for thunderbird 3.1.6/3.1.7 from source. While it works well on i386, compilation fails for x86_64. Any advice how to fix the spec file? ... rm -f libthebes.so c++ -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth

The 5.3 upgrade broke the kickstart procedures for my xen virtual machines. They are installed via http. 1. The installer sets up the timezone interactively even though it is specified in the kickstart file. Not a big deal, though. 2. The installer hangs unpredictably when installing selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-203.el5.noarch.rpm. Performing a dozen or so installs, sometimes the

This is a problem I've had on and off under CentOS5 and CentOS6, with both xen and kvm. Currently, it happens consistently with kvm on 6.5, e.g. with every kernel update. I *think* it generally worked fine with the 6.4 kernels. There are 7 VMs running on a 6.5, x86_64, 8GB RAM host, each with 512MB RAM and using the e1000 NIC. I picked this specific NIC because the default does not allow

In article <55D2ED32.6040000 at hogranch.com>, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2015 1:27 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> You should now be using mysql55 on CentOS-5, not mysql-5.0 > > That may well be the case, but isn't relevant to the point I'm making, > > which is that something changed in openssl-0.9.8e-36 that has broken

http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories Under "CentOS-Fasttrack", the links to the Readme and CentOS6 repo are broken (again, if the list archives are anything to go by ...).