search for: lguest_write_gdt_entri

On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 01:14 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:496: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:497: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:498: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > > paravirt_ops.write_ldt_entry = lguest_write_ldt_entry; >

On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 01:14 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:496: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:497: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > arch/i386/lguest/lguest.c:498: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > > paravirt_ops.write_ldt_entry = lguest_write_ldt_entry; >

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> lguest is a simple hypervisor for Linux on Linux. Unlike kvm it doesn't need VT/SVM hardware. Unlike Xen it's simply "modprobe and go". Unlike both, it's 5000 lines and self-contained. Performance is ok, but not great (-30% on kernel compile). But given its hackability, I expect this to improve, along with the

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> lguest is a simple hypervisor for Linux on Linux. Unlike kvm it doesn't need VT/SVM hardware. Unlike Xen it's simply "modprobe and go". Unlike both, it's 5000 lines and self-contained. Performance is ok, but not great (-30% on kernel compile). But given its hackability, I expect this to improve, along with the

As promised to Andrew, and with much thanks to Andi Kleen for feedback, this is the new series of lguest patches. Main change is the move to drivers/lguest (for future non-i386 expansion), but lots of cleanups driven by Andi's feedback and the documentation effort (which made me examine every line of code). It's not perfect, but it's definitely useful. Cheers, Rusty. List of

As promised to Andrew, and with much thanks to Andi Kleen for feedback, this is the new series of lguest patches. Main change is the move to drivers/lguest (for future non-i386 expansion), but lots of cleanups driven by Andi's feedback and the documentation effort (which made me examine every line of code). It's not perfect, but it's definitely useful. Cheers, Rusty. List of

Hi all, Testing would be appreciated (esp. Ron?): I'd like to push this as soon as possible into 2.6.23. I thought of it while pondering kvm-lite, and then proved it was a problem... == If a Guest makes hypercall which sets a GDT entry to not present, we currently set any segment registers using that GDT entry to 0. Unfortunately, this is not sufficient: there are other ways of altering

Hi all, Testing would be appreciated (esp. Ron?): I'd like to push this as soon as possible into 2.6.23. I thought of it while pondering kvm-lite, and then proved it was a problem... == If a Guest makes hypercall which sets a GDT entry to not present, we currently set any segment registers using that GDT entry to 0. Unfortunately, this is not sufficient: there are other ways of altering

The following changes since commit ff54250a0ebab7f90a5f848a0ba63f999830c872: Linus Torvalds (1): Remove 'recurse into child resources' logic from 'reserve_region_with_split()' are available in the git repository at: ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-lguest-and-virtio.git master Marcelo Tosatti (1): virtio: fix suspend when using

The following changes since commit ff54250a0ebab7f90a5f848a0ba63f999830c872: Linus Torvalds (1): Remove 'recurse into child resources' logic from 'reserve_region_with_split()' are available in the git repository at: ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux-2.6-lguest-and-virtio.git master Marcelo Tosatti (1): virtio: fix suspend when using

The netfilter code had very good documentation: the Netfilter Hacking HOWTO. Noone ever read it. So this time I'm trying something different, using a bit of Knuthiness. Start with drivers/lguest/README. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/extract | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 9

The netfilter code had very good documentation: the Netfilter Hacking HOWTO. Noone ever read it. So this time I'm trying something different, using a bit of Knuthiness. Start with drivers/lguest/README. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/extract | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 9

The netfilter code had very good documentation: the Netfilter Hacking HOWTO. Noone ever read it. So this time I'm trying something different, using a bit of Knuthiness. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/extract | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 9 +++-- drivers/lguest/Makefile

The netfilter code had very good documentation: the Netfilter Hacking HOWTO. Noone ever read it. So this time I'm trying something different, using a bit of Knuthiness. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/extract | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 9 +++-- drivers/lguest/Makefile

Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should contain. The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped in a paravirt_ops structure,

Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should contain. The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped in a paravirt_ops structure,

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

plain text document attachment (lguest64.patch) This is the main core code for the lguest64. Have fun, and don't hurt the puppies! Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Index: work-pv/arch/x86_64/lguest/Makefile