search for: lgtms

..., but I'd be interested in why OAuth is a problem for you The privacy policies you would have to agree to are really scary, possibly even illegal in Europe. It seems like a completely unnecessary obstacle to participating in code review. Are you concerned about unauthorized reviews? Drive-by LGTMs? /jakob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121018/d61e6b8a/attachment.html>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 10/18/2012 4:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> >> Facebook is not the only OAuth provider though. We should be able to >> support essentially any you would prefer if that's all. Manuel's comment >> still stands if OAuth is a problem. >> > > My

...s a problem for you > > > The privacy policies you would have to agree to are really scary, possibly > even illegal in Europe. > > It seems like a completely unnecessary obstacle to participating in code > review. > > Are you concerned about unauthorized reviews? Drive-by LGTMs? > I'm not concerned at all. I think having a login has a lot of usability features for a website (showing you your configured stuff, setting up rules, etc). I myself was surprised that phabricator didn't offer a simple "sign me up with a name and an insecure password I hand you&qu...