Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "lgtmed".
2016 Jul 29
2
Target Acceptance Policy
...quot;must have" to "suggested" and add something
like "can be transformed to official status earlier if there is enough
support from LLVM maintainers". We can even formalize what "enough support"
means -- say, at least three maintainers employed by other companies LGTMed
this.
Yours,
Andrey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160729/3500a1d5/attachment.html>
2013 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] Special case list files; a bug and a slowness issue
...ingSet for symbol patterns which do not contain regex
> metacharacters. There would still be a regex for any other patterns,
> which would have anchors added automatically.
>
I think that it's fine to add anchors automatically to implement the
behavior
described in the docs (I've LGTMed that patch). Do you want to avoid adding
anchors
for dfsan SpecialCaseList?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Peter
>
> [1] https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer
> [2] https://code.google.com/p/thread-sanitizer/wiki/Flags
>
--
Alexey Sa...
2016 Jul 29
0
Target Acceptance Policy
On 29 Jul 2016 12:00 p.m., "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>
wrote:
> ...and this requirement pushes conversion of Lanai back-end to an
official target status to Sep 28th as earliest. Just saying.
>
> [Personally, I believe that given the level of support, Lanai is already
ready for an official status. But if we codify "must have" rules, they
should
2016 Jul 29
0
Target Acceptance Policy
...quot; to "suggested" and add something
> like "can be transformed to official status earlier if there is enough
> support from LLVM maintainers". We can even formalize what "enough support"
> means -- say, at least three maintainers employed by other companies LGTMed
> this.
A bit too specific, but I think we can make this work... I'll try again.
cheers,
--renato
2013 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] Special case list files; a bug and a slowness issue
Hi,
I need to be able to use a special case list file containing thousands
of entries (namely, a list of libc symbols, to be used when using
DFSan with an uninstrumented libc). Initially I built the symbol
list like this:
fun:sym1=uninstrumented
fun:sym2=uninstrumented
fun:sym3=uninstrumented
...
fun:sym6000=uninstrumented
What I found was that, despite various bits of documentation [1,2],
the
2019 Nov 18
5
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
...opriate amount of time to wait before
committing in this case."
What I want to avoid is me (UK timezone) making some suggestions on a patch
proposed by someone e.g. in the US, then a reviewer from the US getting
into an active discussion, proposing a counter-suggestion, which gets
adopted and LGTMed by that reviewer, resulting in a commit before I've had
a chance to follow up on my comments etc. Obviously I can make post-commit
requests, but sometimes it feels like the bar for suggestions post-commit
is higher, and therefore my comments might not reach that level etc.
James
On Sat, 16 No...
2016 Jul 27
4
Target Acceptance Policy
Re-cap, after reviews. Main changes:
* Making it clear that the "active community" behaviour is expected to
continue throughout the target's lifetime.
* Making it clear that only a reduced set of violation will be allowed
in the experimental phase, providing the maintainers are taking the
cost to move it to full compliance.
* Trust, but verify: If the target's community
2019 Nov 20
4
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
...mount of time to wait before committing in this case."
>
> What I want to avoid is me (UK timezone) making some suggestions on a patch proposed by someone e.g. in the US, then a reviewer from the US getting into an active discussion, proposing a counter-suggestion, which gets adopted and LGTMed by that reviewer, resulting in a commit before I've had a chance to follow up on my comments etc. Obviously I can make post-commit requests, but sometimes it feels like the bar for suggestions post-commit is higher, and therefore my comments might not reach that level etc.
>
>
> I agre...
2019 Nov 15
17
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
Hi, everyone,
I've been fielding an increasing number of questions about how our
code-review process in LLVM works from people who are new to our
community, and it's been pointed out to me that our documentation on
code reviews is both out of date and not as helpful as it could be to
new developers.
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews
I would like to compose a