search for: lgg

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Louis Gerbarg" <lgg at apple.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:09:49 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Indexing of structs vs arrays in getelementpointer > > > > > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:54 PM...

...redict.lda(model,data): wrong number of variables, even if I know that I used the same number of variables for the model generation (6) and for the additional data generation (6 also). I paste the code I am using: library(MASS) Tumor <- c(rep("MM",20),rep("GBM",18),rep("LGG",17)) data.lda <- lda(data,Tumor) data.ld <- predict(data.lda) data.ldd <- data.frame(data.ld$x,data.ld$class) library(rggobi) data.g <- ggobi(data.ldd) library(classifly) generate_classification_data(data.lda,data,method="grid",n=100000) Could you help me? Best regard...

...ggobi. I have GGobi already installed on my computer. I have three classes, so the plot would be LD1xLD2 plus the decission boundaries. Here there is the code I use make the plot: library(MASS) data <- zgcppr273K.pca$x[,1:7] Tumor <- c(rep("MM",23),rep("GBM",25),rep("LGG",17)) data.lda <- lda(data,Tumor) data.ld <- predict(data.lda) data.ldd <- data.frame(data.ld$x,data.ld$class) library(rggobi) data.g <- ggobi(data.ldd) The problem is that I do not know how to plot the decission boundaries oh the graph I have made. I beg some answer as soon as y...

On May 22, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Louis Gerbarg <lgg at apple.com> wrote: > The problem that the above transform is technically illegal because “When indexing into a (optionally packed) structure, only i32 integer constants are allowed (when using a vector of indices they must all be the same i32 integer constant).” rule <http://llvm.org/doc...

Recently I posted a patch to migrate certain GEPs between basic blocks in cases where doing so would improve the ability of instcombine to merge into more complicated addressing mode (r209049 and r209065). After some build to failures it was rolled back. I now have a patch that no longer causes the regressions I was seeing, but it also no longer can optimize the case I was trying to optimize. As

> On Aug 21, 2014, at 12:23 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2014, at 18:03, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> There’s a few more subtleties, but that’s a reasonable analogy. While the sub-arch is related to a -march= setting, it is very definitely not the same thing. It’s not even just the sub-arch. Consider,

...nf > file: > PATH DEFAULT=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games > then when I login with ssh, I get garbage for a path: > ?Cr/t?l@??Cca?>l@?'@/bi?????>n@?'@4????\&@lg&@?\&@??????:@?????Cr/t?l@??Cca?>l@?'@/bi?????>n@?'@4????\&@lgg&@?\&@??????:@???? > Disableing pam_env.so in the ssh pam file fixes this. Also, putting PATH > in /etc/environment and excluding it from pam_env.conf works. I'd > normally think this is a pam bug, but I've only seen this with ssh. Ciao Christian -- Debian...

...t valid users = @teachers The shares "agbschueler" and "agblehrer" work very fine, i.e. no problem. But when trying to connect to "agbhome" the user is prompted for a login and password. But with correct login/password the share wasn't connected. admin:~ # ls -lgG /export/dfsroot/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 20 2007-03-28 09:36 home -> msdfs:172.18.160.10\ lrwxrwxrwx 1 43 2007-02-04 11:44 lehrer -> msdfs:172.18.160.10\lehrer$\_Lehrerbereich_ lrwxrwxrwx 1 28 2007-03-28 09:35 schueler -> msdfs:172.18.160.10\schueler Thanks for any...

...ZIWbOUkUqQQ cdCAcenA4qLULi7gktltIYJfNcq3mylMfKTxhT6f57WYIVt4hEhcqOhkkZz+bEk025torqIRzBsA 7gUcowPqCCCKm65vICCa5uk8mKO2ie5dSzKZiEUDGfm25PUfw/lU1pObiAO6eW4JV0zkBgcHB7j/ ADxUTaZaGCOEI6LHkqY5XRueuWBBOepyeTyasQQpbwrFECFX1YsT3JJPJPuaHa2gEGoXU1okbw2w uAzhCok2tzwMZGD+JFU7zVrm0EMb2Qa5kDMVRpHQKCOcrGTzkdVHf2zevLGG9CCcy4Q5HlzPHz/w EjNJLp9vNDHG/m/uvuuJnDj/AIGDuP504uPUCumo3FxDB9nsiJpFZmS4YxBADg/wk8npx09KhS8v F0VbgqXkDsJDI6q6gOR2UqTxjoBVx9MtnijjYz/u87XFxIHGeo37txHsT2HpUZ0WyNsLfbOsIYts W5kUZPXo36fX1p3gIk1K8lsoFeG2admbGAHIHHU7VY/pVUalezWtlNb2kG64dldJZiNuA3cKf7vO RkdMell9LtpI4kY3H7rO1hcyB+euW3ZP4mnvYWz2qWxVxGhypWRl...

...+fCH//KZp/q7K59+0YOe/euPN9UJivn4r17r8sd3AfDt+rLgH/Vbj/3rCw7sDE72CJDsTqEUWEE+ > UKEWXEZBugFFFiI/1oMCUmA/JnCHUiBmHnCHcqgbZmEDjyECI//CQiwkH/6DBCEiItyjIxxEYyxk > eb4hIDiQGUhQQr5hHGrQQiKkGiLkHr6hAnPwBoUwCL8hH/LBh3IEaIQmaJjwIkAu1Owu+KTQ2UDj > 1V5u2FZPCv8O5QJv2CSP8QzP5ShP5myO57ot+67t+xwPDKUi/OAt/LgG/DjPTDov6dqP9OAvD99P > D/kN/+6P3+aN/gDw//pv4QrR9QiQEFOtABfxAFvhompBPryjG0KwG9RhP2ZGBCNQGzLAQZpBGmpm > Z8rBEnWoFMtjIZYhQXBwHjTAG4pQhAzIE4kBY2hBBR5sAlYAGNBhFngxHbjhY3wBB0kwIoCwIvIh > BluxP6IhGnD/sASA8ASPMSPAQRrtQwmX8Bp5ZCQYrKaSotNGbu6Ojfh+59X6Lvj0DRybD9iUL/Bi > jg3PkAypTQwRD/oSDw257/sI7/Lc...

...9+0YOe/euPN9UJivn4r17r8sd3AfDt+rLgH/Vbj/3rCw7sDE72CJDsTqEUWEE+ > > UKEWXEZBugFFFiI/1oMCUmA/JnCHUiBmHnCHcqgbZmEDjyECI//CQiwkH/6DBCEiItyjIxxEYyxk > > eb4hIDiQGUhQQr5hHGrQQiKkGiLkHr6hAnPwBoUwCL8hH/LBh3IEaIQmaJjwIkAu1Owu+KTQ2UDj > > 1V5u2FZPCv8O5QJv2CSP8QzP5ShP5myO57ot+67t+xwPDKUi/OAt/LgG/DjPTDov6dqP9OAvD99P > > D/kN/+6P3+aN/gDw//pv4QrR9QiQEFOtABfxAFvhompBPryjG0KwG9RhP2ZGBCNQGzLAQZpBGmpm > > Z8rBEnWoFMtjIZYhQXBwHjTAG4pQhAzIE4kBY2hBBR5sAlYAGNBhFngxHbjhY3wBB0kwIoCwIvIh > > BluxP6IhGnD/sASA8ASPMSPAQRrtQwmX8Bp5ZCQYrKaSotNGbu6Ojfh+59X6Lvj0DRybD9iUL/Bi > > jg3PkAyp...

Hi, I want to improve the way CGP sinks the incoming values of a PHI node towards memory accesses. Improving it means a lot to some of our key benchmarks, and I believe can benefit many general cases as well. CGP's OptimizeMemoryInst function handles PHI nodes by running AddressingModeMatcher on all incoming values to see whether they reach consensus on the addressing mode. It does a