search for: lfile

* I am currently reading in a series of files, applying the same functions to them one at a time, and then merging the resulting data frames e.g.: >MyRows <- c("RowA", "RowB", "RowC")>>File1_DF <- read.delim("\\\\DirectoryToFiles\\File1_Folder\\File1.txt", stringsAsFactors=FALSE, check.names=FALSE)>File1_DF <-

Dear all, Good day! I have a problem in reading Excel files in R and appending them to each other. Suppose we have several Excel files in a directory with headers and want to use R to append them in a single file with an additional variable in the final file indicating from which files the data come from. As I have many Excel files and their sizes are very big I should write a loop in R to do

...Try the following. >> >> >> # This needs several other packages >> # install.packages("XLConnect") >> require(XLConnect) >> >> fpattern <- "Book.*.xls?" # pattern for filenames >> output.file <- "Test.xls" >> lfiles <- list.files(pattern = fpattern) >> >> # Read first worksheet from each file >> data.lst <-lapply(lfiles, readWorksheetFromFile, sheet = 1) >> >> # Get column names from data.frames >> data.names <- lapply(data.lst, names) >> >> # Create a...

...the MWI lamps based on events pushed out of Asterisk. They may be obsolete hardware but they came in real handy for extracting the voicemail from the old StarTalk NAM too. Take a look at the PBX Integration section of http://resource.intel.com/telecom/support/releases/winnt/SR511FP1/onldoc/htm lfiles/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:akohlsmith-asterisk@benshaw.com] > Sent: September 8, 2004 6:24 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Maximum tollerable lag/jitter > for IAX2 w/o > j it...

Forwarded, so the list knows about it. I'm making the changes now. Monty > Hey Monty, I have a few fixes that need to get made to the CVS tree to > fix a couple of broken things. None are worth sending you a diff. > > vorbisfile.o needs to be removed from the lib/Makefile in LFILES since > vorbisfile.a is a seperate lib now. As it stands I get unresolved > symbol errors when linking with them, so this is a fairly important fix. > > sharedbook.c should really #include <math.h> and <string.h> for rint and > memset, respectively. > > That'...

> > vorbisfile.o needs to be removed from the lib/Makefile in LFILES since > > vorbisfile.a is a seperate lib now. As it stands I get unresolved > > symbol errors when linking with them, so this is a fairly important fix. This is an error in the build, yes, but I don't see why you'd get unresolved symbols. *unused*, yes, but not unresolved.....

Hi- I have an upcoming application that requires use of PRI channels that are primarily used for high-volume incoming traffic, but that are to be used for outbound calling as well. Of course, one option is to have dedicated outbound channels reserved, but this is an inefficient use of channel resources. Normally PBX's are designed to have the CPE yield to an incoming call if a particular

...o (depending on the current mode of the > linker) in each of the library search paths. > > There is some precedent for including files and libraries from > linkerscripts > https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/File-Commands.html#File-Commands > , these distinguish between "-lfile" and "file". Would this be a > better fit for a ld.bfd interface compatible linker? > > I was hoping to avoid GNUism's and use a "general" mechanism. MSVC source code compatibility is a usecase. > > 6. A new command line option --no-llvm-autolink will t...

...> linker) in each of the library search paths. >>> >>> There is some precedent for including files and libraries from >>> linkerscripts >>> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/File-Commands.html#File-Commands >>> , these distinguish between "-lfile" and "file". Would this be a >>> better fit for a ld.bfd interface compatible linker? >>> >>> >> I was hoping to avoid GNUism's and use a "general" mechanism. MSVC source >> code compatibility is a usecase. >> >> >&g...

...ch paths. >>>>> >>>>> There is some precedent for including files and libraries from >>>>> linkerscripts >>>>> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/File-Commands.html#File-Commands >>>>> , these distinguish between "-lfile" and "file". Would this be a >>>>> better fit for a ld.bfd interface compatible linker? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I was hoping to avoid GNUism's and use a "general" mechanism. MSVC >>>> source code compatibilit...

At Sony we offer autolinking as a feature in our ELF toolchain. We would like to see full support for this feature upstream as there is anecdotal evidence that it would find use beyond Sony. In general autolinking (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-linking) allows developers to specify inputs to the linker in their source code. LLVM and Clang already have support for autolinking on ELF via