Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lfb9".
Did you mean:
afb9
2011 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
...l __Z3bazv
LEHE2:
. . .
GCC_except_table1:
LLSDA9:
.byte 0xff # @LPStart format (omit)
.byte 0x9b # @TType format (indirect pcrel sdata4)
.byte 0x59 # uleb128 0x59; @TType base offset
.byte 0x3 # call-site format (udata4)
.byte 0x41 # uleb128 0x41; Call-site table length
.set L$set$5,LEHB2-LFB9
.long L$set$5 # region 0 start
.set L$set$6,LEHE2-LEHB2
.long L$set$6 # length
.set L$set$7,L20-LFB9
.long L$set$7 # landing pad
.byte 0x5 # uleb128 0x5; action
. . . [ elided for readability ]
.byte 0x7d # Action record table
.byte 0x0
.byte 0x2
.byte 0x7d
.byte 0x7f
.byte 0x7d
.byt...
2011 Aug 05
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Exception Handling Rewrite
Bill,
ooops, yes, I described the meaning of "throw(A)" backwards,
but I still
think my example shows why you cannot merge LandingpadInst while
inlining because multiple filter-lists on a LandingpadInst don't make
sense.
Perhaps I'm reading your original spec wrong, perhaps I'm mis-reading
Duncan's emails, but I read them to mean that your syntax supports