Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lfb74".
Did you mean:
lfb76
2018 Sep 12
2
OpenJDK8 failed to work after compiled by LLVM 8 for X86
...is made to write to that read-only segment,
> which will usually segfault, depending on how strictly the underlying
> operating system enforces these protections.
>
> In contrast, gcc 8.2.0 produces:
>
> .globl main
> .type main, @function
> main:
> .LFB74:
> .cfi_startproc
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
> xorl %eax, %eax
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+8(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY...
2018 Sep 11
3
OpenJDK8 failed to work after compiled by LLVM 8 for X86
Hi Dimitry,
Thanks for your kind response!
Thanks for the commit message of Jung's patch, I found that the bug had
been fixed in OpenJDK 12 by Zhengyu
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205965 But only backported to
11. So Jung could backport it for OpenJDK 8, thanks a lot!
But I argue that the root cause might be in the compiler side, why
clang-3.9.1, gcc-6.4.1 couldn't