search for: lexort

On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > > I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/a...

On 2/04/2020 5:28 AM, Mark Boyce wrote: > On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com > <mailto:gdt at lexort.com>> wrote: >> >> I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. > > sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) > > Mark Or the stateful entry still exists when the table entry is updated. Do...

On 2020-04-01 16:28, Mark Boyce wrote: > On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com > <mailto:gdt at lexort.com>> wrote: >> >> I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. > > sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) block drop in log quick on bge0 from <AUTOBLOCK> to any block drop out log quick...

Also, which version of NUT is involved? There were recently PRs (merged to master-branch, eventually will be in 2.8.1) about more SNMP-UPS support including APCs e.g. 1674, 1679, 1113 (should be in 2.8.0)... Many distros still ship 2.7.4... Jim On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 00:57 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > mateuszx via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > > > At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC MGE > > Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH). > > I have it set up to work with snmp-ups NUT driver. > > Despi...

...ding the device numbers (3 digits) to configs should help. Also `-x` is for command-libe specification of such parameters. In config file it is just key=value. For these matchers they are generally regexes (not shell globs). Please do RTFM :) Jim On Sat, Jan 14, 2023, 01:11 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> > writes: > > > I'm using the latest updates to OS and running the latest apt nut > packages > > in the dist (2.7.x?). > > Debian 11 has 2.7.4. > > That's old; 2....

On 2/04/2020 6:35 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > On 2020-04-01 16:28, Mark Boyce wrote: >> On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com >> <mailto:gdt at lexort.com>> wrote: >>> I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. >> sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) > block drop in log quick on bge0 from <AUTOBLOCK> to any > block drop out log...

...in the sub-package neon @0.29.6_2 and not pull in a litany of other dependencies for a small utility like upsmon? Finally, thank you to all who continue to maintain the project. It is a great set of utilities. >From: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> >To: Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> >To that tune, here with NUT being an important cog to keep >machines >running, even those who might struggle due to respectable age, there is >some deliberate effort to support 25 years' worth of dependencies so that >current NUT can be built as far back as CentOS 7 or...

...) to configs > should help. Also `-x` is for command-libe specification of such > parameters. In config file it is just key=value. For these matchers they > are generally regexes (not shell globs). Please do RTFM :) > > Jim > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023, 01:11 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > >> Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> >> writes: >> >> > I'm using the latest updates to OS and running the latest apt nut >> packages >> > in the dist (2.7.x?). >> >> Debian 11 has...

I am (belatedly) updating pkgsrc to 2.8.1 (+ bugfix). (FWIW, I think a 2.8.1.1 or 2.8.2 immediately with the fix is in order. >From a packaging viewpoint, the effort to update for a release is about 3 minutes plus time to adapt anythhing that has changed. So I'd much rather have releases more often.) In the pkgsrc build, nut finds tcp wrappers because they are part of the base system.

...A couple of driver contributions are actively brewing (including long-awaited APC-ModBus support), so I'm looking out for the opportunity to merge them too, so the upcoming release lets the greater public see them and report back... Jim On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:06?PM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > I stuck in a comment in an issue, but I think we're overdue, picking 6 > months as arbitrary. > > I just created a snapshot privately. It passes make check on netbsd 9 > amd64. I am updating pkgsrc-wip, which involves adjusting a lot of > packages that I be...

...A couple of driver contributions are actively brewing (including long-awaited APC-ModBus support), so I'm looking out for the opportunity to merge them too, so the upcoming release lets the greater public see them and report back... Jim On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:06?PM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > I stuck in a comment in an issue, but I think we're overdue, picking 6 > months as arbitrary. > > I just created a snapshot privately. It passes make check on netbsd 9 > amd64. I am updating pkgsrc-wip, which involves adjusting a lot of > packages that I be...

...CapacityMode while parsing RemainingCapacity and its friends? Although the more I look into this, the more I think I won't bother and submit the PR with comments that CapacityMode is assumed to be 2 and maybe a log message if it isn't? On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 7:50?AM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > Kelly Byrd <kbyrd at memcpy.com> writes: > > > Making progress on this PR. I have question about storing and checking > > state in a subdriver > > HID Power Devices can a "UPS.PowerSummary.CapacityMode" value. According > to > > the...

Tom via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: >>That makes sense. So you'll have input voltage, output voltage, and >>output current I would guess. You might consider a nodemcu (ESP8266) >>publishing via MQTT to reduce power and use of unobtainium. > > Yes, that is exactly what I was planning to instrument. Maybe battery > voltage too

...h, eventually will be in 2.8.1) about more SNMP-UPS support >>> including APCs e.g. 1674, 1679, 1113 (should be in 2.8.0)... >>> >>> Many distros still ship 2.7.4... >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 00:57 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: >>> >>>> mateuszx via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: >>>> >>>> > At my workplace I have exact UPS config as stated in the subject (APC >>>> MGE >>>> > Galaxy 5500 + AP9635CH)....

...help. Also `-x` is for command-libe specification of such >> parameters. In config file it is just key=value. For these matchers they >> are generally regexes (not shell globs). Please do RTFM :) >> >> Jim >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023, 01:11 Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: >> >>> Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> >>> writes: >>> >>> > I'm using the latest updates to OS and running the latest apt nut >>> packages >>> > in the dist (2.7.x?). &gt...

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 2:00 PM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > Dovid Bender <dovid at telecurve.com> writes: > > > So long as the tcp socket is open your SBC should send the call back over > > the same socket. Now it can be that your SBC is seeing the socket as > > timing out. If you are using Kamailio you can ha...

Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I'm using the latest updates to OS and running the latest apt nut packages > in the dist (2.7.x?). Debian 11 has 2.7.4. That's old; 2.8.0 was released in spring of 2022. And git master has a lot of improvements since 2.8.0, and I would therefore recommend trying that. I think but am not 100%

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> writes: > By the way, on the NUT CI farm the libwrap is present on some (though not > all) systems - covering linux, freebsd, openindiana... and neither > complained about `sockdebug` :\ > > What version do you have? Maybe it is some alternate implementation? Looks like 7.4, as amended in NetBSD over the years. Looks like the

Marek Greško <marek.gresko at protonmail.com> writes: > But I am not sure why this is happening. I have sip providers hostname > in /etc/hosts file to prevent such situations. Should I reconfigure it > not to use hosts file but rather some RPZ on DNS server? Does asterisk > ignore hosts file? Or does it try to do some srv lookups? But in > either case, why does this influence

...e actively brewing (including > long-awaited APC-ModBus support), so I'm looking out for the opportunity to > merge them too, so the upcoming release lets the greater public see them > and report back... > > Jim > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:06?PM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > >> I stuck in a comment in an issue, but I think we're overdue, picking 6 >> months as arbitrary. >> >> I just created a snapshot privately. It passes make check on netbsd 9 >> amd64. I am updating pkgsrc-wip, which involves adjusting a lot of...