Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lettner".
Did you mean:
lattner
2013 Oct 07
5
[LLVMdev] Open work items with a small scope
Dear Clang/LLVM community!
We (a group of 3 highly motivated CS grad students) are taking a class
about compilers and optimizations.
This class offers the option of doing a implementation project (instead of
reading/writing x papers) for its main part.
Of course hacking is much more fun than ... ;)
So my question is do you know of any open points, compiler passes,
optimizations in the LLVM /
2013 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Open work items with a small scope
...capturing variables with variable-length
array type. There is a similar question (is it posted by one of you?) and
more elaborate answer: https://github.com/clang-omp/clang/issues/12
Yours,
Andrey Bokhanko
=============
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Julian Lettner <julian.lettner at uci.edu>wrote:
> Dear Clang/LLVM community!
>
> We (a group of 3 highly motivated CS grad students) are taking a class
> about compilers and optimizations.
> This class offers the option of doing a implementation project (instead of
> reading/writing x pa...
2019 Apr 26
2
[ASan][Windows] Interceptor function type not compatible with intercepted function
Hi,
I triggered a build failure on a Windows-sanitizer by making the sanity checking in `ASAN_INTERCEPT_FUNC` a bit stricter.
My best guess is that the type of the defined interceptor is not compatible (in C++ typing terms) with the “real” function.
This seems to be the case for the following 2 functions:
CreateThread “no conversion”:
From: 'DWORD (__cdecl *)(void * ,
2019 Feb 25
2
[Sanitizers] Platforms that don't support stack unwinding
...Embedded platforms often omit all unwinding information to save space.
>
> If you have a recent instruction pointer from user code, then just reporting that one instruction pointer can still be useful.
>
> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Julian Lettner via llvm-dev
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 1:30 PM
> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [llvm-dev] [Sanitizers] Platforms that don't support stack unwinding
>
> Hi,
>
> In sanitizer code we have two notions of stack unwinders: fast and slow. [1] In...
2019 Feb 25
2
[Sanitizers] Platforms that don't support stack unwinding
Hi,
In sanitizer code we have two notions of stack unwinders: fast and slow. [1] In the context of sanitizers, stack unwinding is most often for printing error reports that include a stack trace.
I am currently trying to fix an issue that is related to some platforms (Darwin) only supporting the fast unwinder, but calling code not being aware of that possibility.
My mental model was that