search for: lessspillweightpriority

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "lessspillweightpriority".

[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
2010 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
I was studying the basic register allocator, and I am wondering why "LessSpillWeightPriority" priority was used over the greater weight. - Thanks Jeff Kunkel
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
2010 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
On Oct 28, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Kunkel wrote: > I was studying the basic register allocator, and I am wondering why > "LessSpillWeightPriority" priority was used over the greater weight. Because the front of std::priority_queue is the largest element given the ordering.
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
2010 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
...why a lesser weight is better than a greater weight. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Kunkel wrote: > >> I was studying the basic register allocator, and I am wondering why >> "LessSpillWeightPriority" priority was used over the greater weight. > > Because the front of std::priority_queue is the largest element given the ordering. > > >
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
2010 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] The Basic Register allocator
...an a greater weight. > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: >> >> On Oct 28, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Kunkel wrote: >> >>> I was studying the basic register allocator, and I am wondering why >>> "LessSpillWeightPriority" priority was used over the greater weight. >> >> Because the front of std::priority_queue is the largest element given the ordering. >> >> >> >