search for: lessopcod

...I see a few commits from yesterday that may have something to do with it, but no idea what the solution is. -David See MSVC's beautiful and concise output below; Compiling... X86AsmParser.cpp C:\dev\MSVisualStudio\VC\include\xutility(313) : error C2664: 'bool `anonymous-namespace'::LessOpcode::operator ()(llvm::StringRef,const `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry &)' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'const `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry' to 'llvm::StringRef' No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this conversion, or the o...

...ion is. Wow, that's a pretty terrible diagnostic. Does r113198 help? -Chris > > See MSVC's beautiful and concise output below; > > Compiling... > X86AsmParser.cpp > C:\dev\MSVisualStudio\VC\include\xutility(313) : error C2664: 'bool > `anonymous-namespace'::LessOpcode::operator ()(llvm::StringRef,const > `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry &)' : cannot convert parameter 1 > from 'const `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry' to 'llvm::StringRef' > No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform > this c...

...le diagnostic. Does r113198 help? > > -Chris > > > See MSVC's beautiful and concise output below; > > > > Compiling... > > X86AsmParser.cpp > > C:\dev\MSVisualStudio\VC\include\xutility(313) : error C2664: 'bool > > `anonymous-namespace'::LessOpcode::operator ()(llvm::StringRef,const > > `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry &)' : cannot convert parameter 1 > > from 'const `anonymous-namespace'::MatchEntry' to 'llvm::StringRef' > > No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perf...

...32, MCK_FGR32 }, 0, 0}, . . . } So, when the MatchInstructionImpl is called it seems to look for a pair of instructions that match the mnemonic: // Search the table. std::pair<const MatchEntry*, const MatchEntry*> MnemonicRange = std::equal_range(MatchTable, MatchTable+277, Mnemonic, LessOpcode()); The search will always end in first two entries ( Mips::CEIL_L_D64 and Mips::CEIL_L_S) thus reporting the 'invalid operand' error when ceil.w.x instruction is parsed. Is there a way to direct this search somehow, maybe to use available features or we should change the definition of th...

...} > > So, when the MatchInstructionImpl is called it seems to look for a pair of instructions that match the mnemonic: > > // Search the table. > std::pair<const MatchEntry*, const MatchEntry*> MnemonicRange = > std::equal_range(MatchTable, MatchTable+277, Mnemonic, LessOpcode()); > > The search will always end in first two entries ( Mips::CEIL_L_D64 and Mips::CEIL_L_S) thus reporting the 'invalid operand' error when ceil.w.x instruction is parsed. > Is there a way to direct this search somehow, maybe to use available features or we should change the d...