search for: lepistö

...ribution packages, but they have to have llvm sources as well to be able to use our tools. Basically we have workaround where we copy tbgen sources of each supported version of llvm to our project tree and write compile rules and install it with our project, which is a bit painful. Mikael Lepistö -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090505/e49de0d1/attachment.html>

On May 4, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to set tbgen to be installed with llvm? For our > project http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#tta-tce it would be very > helpful, because our tools generate compiler backend plugins in the > fly for each customized processor and plugin g...

Chris Lattner wrote: > > On May 4, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Would it be possible to set tbgen to be installed with llvm? For our >> project http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#tta-tce it would be very >> helpful, because our tools generate compiler backend plugins in the >> fly for each customiz...

...able to just to add checks to loads/sotres that address is inside that memory structure. Does anyone know if there already exist some pass which does something like this (collects static allocations) or should I write this from the scratch ? Does the idea sound reasonable at all ? Cheers, Mikael Lepistö -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130311/c5868a2f/attachment.html>

On 3/11/13 6:32 AM, Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing llvm pass for OpenCL code which does some memory checking to > verify that code does not access memory outside of the programs own > statically allocated areas. If you're looking to see if your program only accesses in-bounds memory, SAFECode a...

...ternalsym:$dst, iAny:$vararg)>; but compilation gives following error: isVoid:void anonymous.52: (intrinsic_void:void 197:iPTR, (tglobaladdr:iPTR):$dst, isVoid:void) /home/elhigu/llvm-install/llvm/Release/bin/tblgen: In anonymous.52: Type inference contradiction found in node! Mikael Lepistö

...t only if llvm libs and includes are installed under the same prefix, even though this seems to be unintended functionality. So after support for building llvm-gcc without llvm sources it would be possible to build e.g. llvm-gcc cross compilers with globally installed llvm package. Mikael Lepistö Begin forwarded message: > From: Mikael Lepistö <mikael.lepisto at tut.fi> > Date: 5. syyskuuta 2009 klo 20.16.48 > To: Commit Messages and Patches for LLVM <llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Building llvm-gcc with llvm-2.5 > debian p...

..., i32 %tmp25). Those "__llvm__custom_op_" prefixed function will not have function body, but pure declarations in C code level. Comments are welcome, especially if there anyone else, that needs this kind of functionality or if people has already implemented something similar. Mikael Lepistö

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, [UTF-8] Mikael Lepist? wrote: > >>> def MOVNTPSmr : PSI<0x2B, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins i128mem:$dst, >>> VR128:$src), >>> "movntps {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >>> [(int_x86_sse_movnt_ps addr:$dst, VR128:$src)]>; >>> >>> There is corresponding cod...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Mikael Lepist� wrote: >> I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation >> support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best >> way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization >> pass for raising certain type of function...

...registration initialisation or something like that? Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? For many other passes (*I)->createPass() does worked correctly. I attached modified PassManager.cpp which shows, where the debug strings are coming from and source code of test.cc program. Thanks, Mikael Lepistö ( for instant helping I'm hanging around on #llvm with elhigu nick ) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test.cc Type: text/x-c++src Size: 1287 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090903/e7...

Mikael Lepistö wrote: > Anybody has an opinion would it be good thing to add support for > llvm-gcc to be able to be built with existing llvm installation? To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. from the Debian package)?...

...arts of llvm- gcc had to be altered for our "tce-llvm-gcc" cross-compiler. I also hardcoded compiler to use llvm-ld and llvm-as as it's bintools, for being able to link and compile e.g. newlib to bytecode library. Is this basically the same thing that you are looking for? Mikael Lepistö On Oct 15, 2007, at 1:04, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Boris, > >> Yes, I know that. configure --target=a-b-c will fail because there >> is no such stuff known in gcc. So, what is the answer/consequence? An >> existing gcc back-end for architecture "a" is a pre...

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, [UTF-8] Mikael Lepist? wrote: >> def MOVNTPSmr : PSI<0x2B, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins i128mem:$dst, >> VR128:$src), >> "movntps {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >> [(int_x86_sse_movnt_ps addr:$dst, VR128:$src)]>; >> >> There is corresponding code in llvm-gcc to tell GCC how to...

Boris, > Yes, I know that. configure --target=a-b-c will fail because there > is no such stuff known in gcc. So, what is the answer/consequence? An > existing gcc back-end for architecture "a" is a precondition for a > LLVM back-end for architecture "a"? No. This is requirement of using gcc as a frontend. This looks pretty weird, but it is: frontend should

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Mikael Lepist� wrote: > I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation > support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best > way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization > pass for raising certain type of function calls to those...

> From: Mikael Lepist? <mikael.lepisto at tut.fi> > > Hi, Hi Mikael > I was talking with aKor in #llvm how we could implement custom operation > support for our ASIP architecture. We came into solution that the best > way would be to write new custom operation intrinsic and optimization > pass...

Mikael Lepistö wrote: > On 15.9.2009, at 12:11, Duncan Sands wrote: > > >> Hi Pekka, >> >> >>> To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow >>> compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. >>> from the Debian package)? I...

On 15.9.2009, at 12:11, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Pekka, > >> To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow >> compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. >> from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch >> Mikael posted. > > I think it would be great if llvm-gcc could be built against > an installed LLVM.

Hi Pekka, > To put it the another way: is there a reason to disallow > compiling llvm-gcc (optionally) against an installed LLVM (e.g. > from the Debian package)? It seems to work fine with this patch > Mikael posted. I think it would be great if llvm-gcc could be built against an installed LLVM. However my impression was that Mikael's original patch would break building against