search for: lepilkina

...39;s equivalent to {{\b}}whatever{{\b}}. I amn't sure if assertion \b is supported. \s will not match with start and of line, but it should be matched. Elena. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Roelofs [mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 5:14 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements On 5/24/16 8:10 AM, Elena Lepilkina wrote: > Hi, > > CHECK-WORD - If you want find some string in file, but you want to be sure, that this string shou...

...ixes which can be described as regular expressions should be turning on with option -regex-prefixes . By default, you can't use it. Thanks for your comments. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Roelofs [mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 5:05 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements On 5/24/16 7:51 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi everyone, > > There was idea to add new directives to FileCheck: > > 1.Directive to...

Ok, when I change syntax I will load new patch. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:38 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements It is necessary to be able to capture a match made with a pattern in a variable. The syntax you suggested for doing this with you...

...One time I can use one, second time I can use another. I can do this with cmake only by changing test_modules in file. So I can’t group some metrics and give them some name. Am I right? Thanks, Elena. From: Matthias Braun [mailto:matze at braunis.de] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 8:03 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; nd <nd at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization On May 12, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Elena Lepilki...

On 5/24/16 8:10 AM, Elena Lepilkina wrote: > Hi, > > CHECK-WORD - If you want find some string in file, but you want to be sure, that this string should be a separate word. Is this functionally equivalent to doing: // CHECK: {{\s}}whatever{{\s}} Or is there some other subtlety about it? Jon > > There are examples...

...? There are two test drivers in LNT. "lnt runtests nt" uses the old Makefile-based system and "lnt runtests test-suite" uses the new cmake-based system. It sounds like you are using the former and should switch to the latter. Cheers, James On Wed, 25 May 2016 at 10:04 Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > > > Thank you for your answer. > > But can you answer for some more questions? > > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results > from result csv file. Are there any...

...change extra brackets with @, but in Mehdi's example everything will be okay id I understood well. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:57 PM To: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> Cc: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements > At first I thought that `register(n)` was some sort of macro, but if it is suppose to be equivalent to the example above of what we do “today”, then using “register(“1”)” is...

> On May 25, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > Thank you for your answer. > But can you answer for some more questions? > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cma...

But then I should write // CHECK: something // SSE: something // SSE3: something With this feature it can be write // {{[A-Z0-9]+}} : something From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:53 PM To: Ehsan Amiri <ehsanamiri at gmail.com> Cc: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ehsan Amiri via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: 7. Wildcard...

> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some dou...

...name or simple text. So I asked you before about syntax of parameters usage during describing patterns. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:57 PM To: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> Cc: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements > At first I thought that `register(n)` was some sort of macro, but if it is suppose to be equivalent to the example above of what we do “today”, then using “register(“1”)” is...

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ehsan Amiri via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 7. Wildcard for prefixes - If some statements should be checked > regardless prefix, it should be used //{{*}}, //{{*}}-NEXT, //{{*}}-SAME > and etc. > >> 8. Prefix with regular expressions - If statement should be >> checked if prefix matches some regular

...patch that adapts the Makefile > structures in test-suite. Maybe it would be better to switch to using the > new cmake+lit system to build and run the programs in the test-suite and > fix the problem there? > > Thanks, > > Kristof > > > On 18 Apr 2016, at 17:16, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> > wrote: > > Greetings everyone, > > We would like to improve LNT. > The following RFC describes two LNT enhancements: > > - Custom (extensible) metrics > - Test parameterization > > > The main idea is in document &gt...

...tions and experiment with tools/compilers without using applications from full LLVM test-suite (~2,5 Gb). Are there reasons why separation of test-suite into 1) basic test-harness and 2) applications is undesirable or impossible? We will be glad to hear opinions of community. Best regards, Elena Lepilkina, Synopsys Corp, ARC processors -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180709/71074990/attachment.html>

...uldn’t be some reports which are known before, but there should be flexible system when we don’t know what metrics user would loke to collect. I will be very grateful for your answers. Thanks, Elena. From: Matthias Braun [mailto:matze at braunis.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:23 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; nd <nd at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization On May 25, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.o...

...en somebody can stop voting at one moment and I will be able to understand what patches I should do and publish if there are some changes you would like. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: Robinson, Paul [mailto:paul.robinson at sony.com] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 2:26 AM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 6:51 AM > To: llvm-dev > Su...

Hi, I have question again about modifiers for pattern parameters. Vedant suggested such way. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: one_or_more(x): x {{+}} But I have some doubts. This should be equal to x+. This approach differs from standard one. In FileCheck I can write CHECK: {{x|y}}{{something}} This line will be equal to regex (x|y)(something). But if I use suggested approach and write same

...es to run custom metrics and generate other report type, right? Are these features of make-version of test-suite planned to be added? Thanks, Elena. From: daniel.dunbar at gmail.com [mailto:daniel.dunbar at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:15 AM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>; James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; nd <nd at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test paramete...

Hi Elena, > On Jul 19, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I made new patches for most of changes with llvm-commits subscriber. But two patches were updated, because there are a lot of comments (patch for CHECK-WORD and patch for templates pattern). Will it be ok? IMO it&...

...2. std::regex. It has no necessary features. So it can't be taken. 3. There is regex library in boost. 4. Also there is regex library in poco. Are there any other variants? Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:37 PM To: Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com>; Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements Hi all, I made new patches for most of changes with llvm-comm...