Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "lepiane".
2007 Feb 22
3
Mixing POP and IMAP
Hi,
I run a small site, about a dozen users, and many of the users POP their mail.
I have just installed Squirrelmail which uses IMAP. Has anyone had any
significant problems with mixing POP and IMAP for mail retreival?
Your feedback is greatly apprecianted,
--
Dominic Lepiane
The IRMACS Centre
Simon Fraser University
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070222/1aa12dfe/attachment.bin...
2006 Oct 30
2
Upgrade from RC7 to RC10 didn't go too well...
...hy is dovecot trying to open files under
there?
I know at least part of the discussion has happened on the list before so I'm
sorry for duplicating other questions. My TODO is about ten km long so I
hope someone can at least give me a couple good pointers.
Thanks in advance!
--
Dominic Lepiane
The IRMACS Centre
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20061030/a8c6e161/attachment.bin>
2006 Jun 20
1
repairing mbox files
...some work so it's clearly a problem that a lot the messages
are malformed somehow.
Server is RHEL 4, dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1
Current client is Mozilla Thunderbird (1.5.0.4) in Mac OS X 10.4.6 using IMAP.
Previous client was MS Entourage (OS x 10.4.6) using POP.
Thanks in advance.
--
Dominic Lepiane
Simon Fraser University/IRMACS
dlepiane@irmacs.sfu.ca
(604)268-7369
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060619/c...
2006 Jul 21
7
My view on 1.0 release and version numbering
Just throwing out some thoughts here. I know Timo has high standards and
is trying to make 1.0 bug free before calling it 1.0. But I want to
argue for an earlier less perfect 1.0.
Dovecot is already way past the quality of most 1.0 releases. So it is
good enough by common standards. No one really expects a 1.0 release to
be perfect. But - some people don't consider a product ripe until it