search for: leledumbo_cool

> Make sure you're using the correct perl - that one which comes with msys DTK I'm using msys perl for msys 1.0.11. Maybe I should revert back to msys 1.0.10? ________________________________ Dari: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> Kepada: leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Terkirim: Sen, 27 September, 2010 13:45:47 Judul: Re: [LLVMdev] Compiling LLVM 2.7 with MinGW GCC 4.5.0 > first line saying: --export-dynamic is not supported for PE targets, do you > mean --export-all-symbols? *or something similar to this* then...

...e better only then to touch a few files. (eg. lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp) The warning of --export-dynamic might be harmless, and you may add the option --enable-auto-import IIRC LLVM-2.7 might not be tested with mingw-4.5.0. ps. I am using msysgit packages. ...Takumi 2010/9/29 leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id>: > > reverting doesn't help. Here are the logs: > http://old.nabble.com/file/p29834726/output.log output.log > http://old.nabble.com/file/p29834726/error.log error.log > which mingw gcc + binutils versions are known to work (or better, the one > that you guy...

> Could you post the errors message? Sounds like bug in mingw's gcc / ld. It's very long, maybe I should just attach the log? I only remember the first line saying: --export-dynamic is not supported for PE targets, do you mean --export-all-symbols? *or something similar to this* then a bunch of undefined references occur. -- View this message in context:

> first line saying: --export-dynamic is not supported for PE targets, do you > mean --export-all-symbols? *or something similar to this* then a bunch of > undefined references occur. Make sure you're using the correct perl - that one which comes with msys DTK -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

reverting doesn't help. Here are the logs: http://old.nabble.com/file/p29834726/output.log output.log http://old.nabble.com/file/p29834726/error.log error.log which mingw gcc + binutils versions are known to work (or better, the one that you guys use)? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Compiling-LLVM-2.7-with-MinGW-GCC-4.5.0-tp29810752p29834726.html Sent from the LLVM -

Attached is a result of configure and make VERBOSE=1: http://old.nabble.com/file/p29846487/output.log output.log http://old.nabble.com/file/p29846487/error.log error.log -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Compiling-LLVM-2.7-with-MinGW-GCC-4.5.0-tp29810752p29846487.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...e-targets=host,x86,cpp' 'CFLAGS=-s -O4' 'CXXFLAGS=-s -O4 -Wl,--enable-auto-import' 'LDFLAGS=-s -O4' --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=../../../projects/sample --enable-shared/DLL was not supported in 2.7. It has worked since Aug 2010. ...Takumi 2010/9/30 leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id>: > > Attached is a result of configure and make VERBOSE=1: > http://old.nabble.com/file/p29846487/output.log output.log > http://old.nabble.com/file/p29846487/error.log error.log > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Compiling-LLVM-2.7-with-...

Other than: %x = add i32 5,0 ; suppose I want to assign 5 to %x is there any other way? Something like x86's mov instruction -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-assign-a-constant-to-a-register--tp29987387p29987387.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id> wrote: > >> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has >> no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or >> causing the program to exit). > > can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? Only if the right func...

> If x is a local variable, it will be stored on the stack. So you need an > alloca for it: Aha, I remember this in Kaleidoscope tutorial. So, after the alloca %x can be modified freely (e.g. without adding suffix)? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-assign-a-constant-to-a-register--tp29987387p30016496.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at

> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has > no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or > causing the program to exit). can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29942236.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, If x is a local variable, it will be stored on the stack. So you need an alloca for it: %x = alloca i8 ; <i8*> Then you can just perform a store: Store i8* %x, i8 0 Cheers, James > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of leledumbo > Sent: 20 October 2010 14:39 > To: llvmdev at

I need to use LLVM from Java, which approach do you recommend? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Using-LLVM-from-Java%3A-using-the-incomplete-binding-or-build-a-jni-for-llvm-c---tp29811105p29811105.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Has anyone succeeded? I kept getting linker errors when building opt. The only additional configure command I use is --enable-optimized. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Compiling-LLVM-2.7-with-MinGW-GCC-4.5.0-tp29810752p29810752.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

If I have: %x = call @externalFunc ... ; other codes where %x is not used ret ; assume void function and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29932485.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

> No, you could throw it into a global if you know you're going to want to use 5 at some point in the future randomly. OK, I guess that's the way I should treat it. Load from global to register, do operations, store it back. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-assign-a-constant-to-a-register--tp29987387p30007489.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list

> Why not just use ConstantInt::get() when you want the number 5? Because I'm not using LLVM libraries, I'm generating LLVM assembly myself. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-assign-a-constant-to-a-register--tp29987387p30008156.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Maybe this is not LLVM specific, but more or less related. The language I'm implementing allows the programmer to define complex data structure like Pascal records. How am I suppose to design the symbol table? What should be recorded there? Just the type name or each of the record element must be stored? -- View this message in context:

Nevermind, I should've used Op XOR 1 instead. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Mapping-of-logical-NOT-in-LLVM-IR-tp30651314p30652403.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

> from what you say, I assume you have some kind of representation (AST or a > lower-level intermediate representation) from which you generate LLVM > assembly. > Is this representation in SSA form? Yes, the representation is an AST. It's not in SSA yet, as it's a direct representation of the input. I'm confused for this node: := / \ x 0 where x is a local