search for: leh_frame_common_begin1

...problem with llvm-gcc-4.0 for any code > containing eh constructs. I think Anton is the guy to look into this (CC'd). > Yeah, I'm seeing this in 4.0 as well. It looks as if the personality function isn't being output into the .s file. So we get something along the lines of this: Leh_frame_common_begin1: .long 0x0 .byte 0x1 .asciz "zPLR" .byte 0x1 .byte 0x7c .byte 0x8 .byte 0x7 .byte 0x1b .long ___gxx_personality_v0-. .byte 0x10 .byte 0x10 .byte 0xc .byte 0x4 .byte...

Hi Bill, > I'm trying it on 4.0. On 4.2, I'm getting this problem during bootstrapping: > > ccAMeZbg.s:111:non-relocatable subtraction expression, > "___gxx_personality_v0" minus "L0" > ccAMeZbg.s:111:symbol: "___gxx_personality_v0" can't be undefined in a > subtraction expression this is the darwin assembler that barfs, right? It

Hi Bill, > I'm compiling this trivial program on Darwin: > > int main(int argc, char **argv) { > try { > throw argc; > } catch(int i) { > return i; > } > > return 0; > } > > However, it segfaults when I run it. I've attached the .s files > generated by LLVM and GCC, but it looks as if LLVM isn't generating a >

Hi all, I'm compiling this trivial program on Darwin: int main(int argc, char **argv) { try { throw argc; } catch(int i) { return i; } return 0; } However, it segfaults when I run it. I've attached the .s files generated by LLVM and GCC, but it looks as if LLVM isn't generating a gxx_personality_v0 section (like it does for Unwind_Resume, et al). Is this what's