Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "leh_frame_common_begin0".
Did you mean:
leh_frame_common_begin
2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has:
Leh_frame_common_begin0:
.long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag
.byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION
.asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation
.byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor
.byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment Factor
.byte 16...
2011 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi,
If I type
define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" {
entry:
%0 = alloca i8*
%1 = call i8* @malloc(i64 1)
store i8* %1, i8** %0
call void @llvm.gcroot(i8** %0, i8* null)
ret i32 0
}
declare i8* @malloc(i64)
declare void @llvm.gcroot(i8**, i8*) nounwind
in test.ll
and then do
> llc test.ll
> gcc test.s
I get the error
ld: in
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
...tor call at the very least...The question becomes which personality function it should call, because that's language-specific.
-bw
On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has:
>
>
> Leh_frame_common_begin0:
> .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag
> .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION
> .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation
> .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor
> .byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignm...
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
...didn't work on this for a while I don't recall exactly how
far I got.
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> -bw
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>
>> The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has:
>>
>>
>> Leh_frame_common_begin0:
>> .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag
>> .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION
>> .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation
>> .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor
>> .byte 120...