search for: legitimacy

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251&tid=158&tid=95&tid=103 Probably some of you already saw this. Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's the technical aspect. Suppose i provide VoIP services using Asterisk, and i fall under the incidence of the FCC ruling and i have to provide a tap to the guys in the black helicopters. What are the g...

I have a Polycom Soundpoint IP335. There are no inbound routes set to the phones yet. However, the phones are getting phantom rings. What is the legitimacy of these calls? Is there something I need to block to stop it? I believe its people trying to hack the phones/phone system but I cannot find where I read that before. Thanks, --E -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digiu...

...electorTy, VTy->getNumElements()); However, the program aborts in RAUW() if we find "selty" is a vector type later, because LLVM are trying to replace an i1 placeholder with an <n x i1> value. A rough idea is to create a BitcodeReader-specific RAUW which doesn't check type legitimacy and any other suggestion is welcome. Bugzilla link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46750 Regards, Mindong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200716/92049cd4/attachment.html>

...electorTy, VTy->getNumElements()); However, the program aborts in RAUW() if we find "selty" is a vector type later, because LLVM are trying to replace an i1 placeholder with an <n x i1> value. A rough idea is to create a BitcodeReader-specific RAUW which doesn't check type legitimacy and any other suggestion is welcome. Bugzilla link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46750 Regards, Mindong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200720/ac6e7c3b/attachment.html>

Excuse dopey question. I'm not exactly clear about certificates. Apache2 default install has this snake oil certificate Can make a new one for apache Can make one for dovecot Can make one for ssl Is there supposed to be the one (self signed ) certificate pair in one place for the machine that each process hands out ? Can they be moved to another machine ? mick -- Key ID C7D6E24C

...he two is the actual case. Given the provenance of the expos? it certainly is not a Russian operation. On Sat, June 13, 2015 11:54, John R Pierce wrote: > > standard operating procedures in the (in)Security business. > > Ironic that the one thing a government needs most to assert its legitimacy is the very thing that its own security forces attack and undermine to the point of collapse; trust. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited...

...Postfix can all use the same certificate, you do need to configure each one to the location of the certificate though. SSL is something else: apache, dovecot, postfix are all services/programs. SSL is a protocol/way of encryption. Self-signed means there is no Certificate Authority backing the legitimacy. Getting a Let's Encrypt certificate (I recommend certbot) will get you a legitime certificate, but only for the hostname (e.g. web01.yourdomain.com) you provide it. This must be traceable to your machine through DNS, so moving it to another machine would only work if that machine would co...

...ron job that runs ...". I believe it's very inappropriate and inconsiderate to mention Microsoft products unless it's really necessary. I'm mostly concerned with the fact that this careless usage not only gives them more publicity than they deserve, but also gives those programs a legitimacy that they don't have since they are proprietary software (and also promoting proprietary standards). Therefore I'd like to suggest that the man page be changed to "which consists of large documents and mail folders", or at least mention another software such as LibreOffice. Than...

...ng differences between having a local postfix server relay the request to google, as oppposed to connecting to the Google smtp server directly. First, does connecting directly to the smtp server somehow validate that the sender of the email is who it says it is, in terms of spam filters? Do I lose legitimacy (in terms of spam filters) by having my local postfix server relay the request? Second, the username i specify in the smtp settings is the user that appears in the "from" header in any emails sent. This is not very ideal, because emails need to come from multiple accounts throughout the...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75761 --- Comment #24 from Lubosz Sarnecki <lubosz at gmail.com> --- Since Weston and Wayland 1.5.0 were released today, I wanted to ask about the status of this bug. Does the patch which causes the regression have enough legitimacy to stay and break Weston? Does someone understand the problem on a large scale? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/...

...top.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75761 --- Comment #25 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- (In reply to comment #24) > Since Weston and Wayland 1.5.0 were released today, I wanted to ask about > the status of this bug. > > Does the patch which causes the regression have enough legitimacy to stay > and break Weston? It seems like a pretty correct fix, at first blush. And was necessary for something else, IIRC. > > Does someone understand the problem on a large scale? It'll take someone with KMS API and Wayland experience to work out what's going on. Probably wou...

...alanced frontend, and the certificates are signed as valid for the DNS name used by that common frontend address. This works well for the primary use case of the systems; however, when wishing to address only a single unit within the pool, the certificate cannot be used to validate that host's legitimacy, as the individual address of that host does not match against the name listed in the principal. >From the perspective of the end user, wishing to connect against a specific address (as specified in the HostName option), but perform validation against a user-specified name that differs from tha...

Hi all, I will be teaching a graduate-level course on R at CU Boulder next semester. I have a teaching idea that might also help improve the R wiki page... I wanted to know what you all thought of it and wanted to solicit some advice about doing it. During the latter part of the course, students will choose a topic of interest (e.g., hierarchical linear modeling), and show how to achieve it in

Hi there, I am new to Ogg/Theora and am trying to compare several video codecs as part of my master thesis at the University of Klagenfurt. Therefore I have a question: will there be any patents problems using Ogg/Theora in the future? Is/will Ogg/Theora stay free from patents rights? This would be a great advantage in using Ogg/Theora instead of e.g. H.264 which is covered with numerous

In the 'me too' vein, I also have an untested 3624 here on the shelf and am waiting on a shipment of T100 cards to play with. Documentation is very hard to come by. Alcatel are certainly the owners of the Mainstreet product line but, without a support contract, any documentation they may have is essentially unavailable as their per-incident fees for support cost more than most of the

...o be included in the default mime.types configuration file that ships with the Apache distribution. Not only does this mean that webmasters won't have to edit this file manually in the future to serve Oggs with the proper MIME type, but it also shows that Ogg is steadily gaining legitimacy. 2.4 Ogg Vorbis Decoder Chip Fresh off the mailing list, here is yet another piece of evidence that Ogg Vorbis is gaining acceptance. FineArch, Inc., have [9]announced that they have completed an Ogg Vorbis decoder chip. Licensors only need to add a few components such as flash memo...

Hi All, Is there anything in Samba that will help protect against ransomware? -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...expose those backups to ordinary userland. Does Samba provide some subtle brilliance to block ransomware from being able to act at atll? Not really, no. The CIFS network file system for providing authorized access to data doesn't *analyze* the requests to read or write data to files for their legitimacy or lack of malice: that's a job for the client side, for the virus scanners or security on the client side. If Samba started trying to say "I smell a witch!!!" based on the transformation of data requested..... oh, dear lord, that could get very resource intensive and very, very messy...

...the same certificate, you do > need to configure each one to the location of the certificate though. > SSL is something else: apache, dovecot, postfix are all > services/programs. SSL is a protocol/way of encryption. Self-signed > means there is no Certificate Authority backing the legitimacy. Getting > a Let's Encrypt certificate (I recommend certbot) will get you a > legitime certificate, but only for the hostname (e.g. > web01.yourdomain.com) you provide it. This must be traceable to your > machine through DNS, so moving it to another machine would only work if &...

While the spirit of BDD is to spec first and code second, many of us have legacy code. Worse, some of us have legacy code without very good coverage. Recognizing that *I* have such code, I created a script that grinds through your .rb files and creates placeholder specs for each public method. While it is more sensible to spec behavior of code function than of individual methods, this