search for: legitim

Dear all, is there any function to assert whether a file path is legitimate, and to convert any potential file path to a legitimate file path? I automate a batch of files and write them to plain text files with cat(). The file argument of cat() is generated automatically which may contain characters such as ? < >, unacceptable in Windows OS. What I do at this mom...

Does anyone have any experience with iax.cc/sixtel? Are they a legitimate company? From their website it looks like you can get a private incoming 800 number for 30 cents/month plus 2 cents/minute. Somehow that pricing seems a little cheap for a DID number. I assume there has to be some minimum usage or something. Any info as far as actual costs and/or voice q...

Hi, Some people have suggested maintaining black lists and white lists to avoid spammers and allow legitimate callers into the network. However, the problem with this method is that the spammer's IP address might change due to DHCP. Today a spammer might get aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and lets say that I put this address in my blacklist. To my annoyance, tomorrow a legitimate caller might get aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd a...

Hi, So now R CMD check starts to warn against :::, but I believe sometimes it is legitimate to use it when developing R packages. For example, I have some utils functions that are not exported but I want to share them across the packages that I maintain. I do not need to coordinate with other authors about these internal functions since I'm the only author and I know clearly what I...

...Subject 01/06/2005 19:40 Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Obtaining Cisco Firmware painlessly and LEGITIMATELY? Please respond to Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial...

I'm experiencing strange problem with my CentOS 4.4 based firewall. In short, it seems to drop packets during larger downloads (several MB in size and larger). Most of the time, the connection itself doesn't break, it is just halted for about a minute or so and that continues. Rather annoying. The problem seems to exist only when downloading content from particular servers. The

Hello, Is there any reason why an IP-phone would pounder on port 5060 ? My firewall blocks the public IP because it thinks the remote IP is port scanning on port 5060. I think the phone is just registering but for some reason it does this repeatedly in a very short time. Oct 28 09:01:48 astserver kernel: Firewall: *UDP_IN Blocked* IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00

On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly prohibited to redistribute them. For the sake of completeness, not everyone with legitimate access to RHEL binaries is necessarily a *paid* customer. Red Hat provides a free dev licence so anyone can legitimately access RHEL binaries (and source RPMs of course) for free, although the use to which one may put the binaries is limited by the licence. -- Mark Rousell

The spamassassin on my server is 3.2.5 and is stock CentOS 5.x. I do apply updates regularly. Most of my legitimate contacts are either whitelisted or sorted into folders before spamassassin sees them, but I have noticed an increasing amount of legitimate mail marked as spam. One issue seems to be the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule. I was able to fix that via running sa-update as root per http://wiki.apache.org/sp...

Hello, I am running v2.0.13. In my dovecot.conf I have: userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-passdb-ldap.conf driver = ldap } Is it legitimate to include multiple ldap userdb's, like: userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap1.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-passdb-ldap1.conf driver = ldap } userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap2.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args =...

I need to review a logfile with Sed and cut out all the lines that start with a certain word, problem is this word begins after some amount of whitespace and unless I search for whitespace at the beginning followed by "word" I may encounter "word" somewhere legitimately hence why I don't just search for "word" only... Anyone know how to make sed accomplish this? Thanks! jlc

Is the difference in behavior below, introduced in 1.8, inconsistent or, at least, undesirable? I couldn't find this in the NEWS. On the one hand, > a <- matrix (1:4, nrow=2) > a <- data.frame (a) > names (a) <- c("break","next") > names (a) [1] "break" "next" On the other, > a <- matrix (1:4, nrow=2) > dimnames(a)

...ssing values. > zrt = ts(zzr, frequency=24) ... omits the missing values and changes the timestamps. > plot(ts(zr)) ... omits the missing values. > zrt = ts(zr, frequency=24) ... omits the missing values and changes the timestamps. > zrt = as.ts(zr) ... inserts 23 NA values between each legitimate value. > zrt = as.ts(zr, frequency=24) ... inserts 23 NA values between each legitimate value. > zrzt = ts(zrz) ... omits the missing values. > zrzt = ts(zrz, frequency=24) ... omits the missing values and changes the timestamps. Could someone tell me how to get the desired ts object?...

Hi, I have noticed that there are problems synchronizing between DC Primary Samba 4 and DC Secondary Windows Server 2008. I have already fixed the issue with the ldbedit command and everything was fine. Over time inconsistencies occur between the DCs again, as shown below: samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://WIN-DC1 ldap://SAMBA4-DC -UAdministrator Password for [EMPRESA\Administrator]: Comparing:

...X = type opaque define void @f_0(%X* %ptr) { %t = load %X, %X* %ptr ret void } define void @f_1(%X %val, %X* %ptr) { store %X %val, %X* %ptr ret void } which I found surprising -- what does it mean to load / store values of unknown sizes? Passing it to llc fails an assertion. Are there legitimate cases where we'd want to generate such IR? -- Sanjoy

...a volatile memcpy will access each byte exactly once. How is that useful? I agree it's probably not that useful, but I think the non-duplicating property of volatile is ingrained strongly enough that viewing a memcpy as a single load and store to each unit (in an unspecified order) should be legitimate; so I think this actually is a bug. As the documentation says though, it's unwise to depend on the behaviour of a volatile memcpy. Cheers. Tim.

>> In the case of user-defined allocation functions, the definitions for those functions are available >Are they? probably not unless you're in an LTO build. Yes, I'm assuming an LTO build. >Printf() is a very nasty one because it can actually affect a lot of state. The %n modifier can cause an argument to be written to. hence it would have HasInaccessibleState and ArgMemOnly

...Rdata"; my $tree = &R::load($regTree); my $ans = &R::call("predict.tree", $tree, $_[0]); On running my code, I get the following error: Error in predict.tree("rtree_2", list("5031601", "GS0098", 0, "1", "1", : not legitimate tree Any help would be appreciated. Thanks -Rachana Rachana Jain rachanaj@yahoo.com Ph: 408-499-9802 (Cell) 513-556-7509 (Res.) 2931 Scioto Lane Apt. No. 1002 Cincinnati OH - 45219, U.S.A. __________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML versi...

...ver. It is not representable in twos-complement form. It cannot be distinguished from unsigned i1 1. It turns out this assert triggers all over the place. Before I dive into this rat hole I'd like to confirm with others my sense that we shouldn't be creating i1 -1 values. Is there some legitimate reason to do so? -David

...s dovecot 2.3.9.3, the latest version. Previous versions built fine, as well as the same version on x86 and x86_64. Note that the build on guix's build farm was done in a qemu vm, but I got the same test failure on real hardware. I'm not sure what the best course of action is. Did I find a legitimate bug, or should I simply ignore that test for that architecture? Dovecot itself seems to be running fine when I ignore the tests. Thanks for any guidance you could provide!