search for: leehu

Thanks! CIL [LeeHu] for a few comments… From: Xinliang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:29 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Capabilities of Clang's PGO (e.g. improving code density) On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Lee Hunt <leehu at...

...nliang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:21 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Capabilities of Clang's PGO (e.g. improving code density) On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com<mailto:leehu at exchange.microsoft.com>> wrote: Thanks! CIL [LeeHu] for a few comments… From: Xinliang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com<mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:29 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu&l...

...liang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:21 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Capabilities of Clang's PGO (e.g. improving code density) On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com<mailto:leehu at exchange.microsoft.com>> wrote: Thanks! CIL [LeeHu] for a few comments… From: Xinliang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com<mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:29 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu&l...

...liang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:21 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Capabilities of Clang's PGO (e.g. improving code density) On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com<mailto:leehu at exchange.microsoft.com>> wrote: Thanks! CIL [LeeHu] for a few comments… From: Xinliang David Li [mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com<mailto:xinliangli at gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:29 AM To: Lee Hunt Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu&l...

Hello - I'm an Engineer in Microsoft Office after looking into possible advantages of using PGO for our Android Applications. We at Microsoft have deep experience with Visual C++'s Profile Guided Optimization<https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e7k32f4k.aspx> and often see 10% or more reduction in the size of application code loaded after using PGO for key scenarios (e.g.

> On 2015 May 27, at 07:42, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> For example, from reading different pages on how Clang PGO, it’s unclear if >> it does “block reordering” (i.e. moving unexecuted code blocks to a distant >> code page, leaving only ‘hot’ executed code packed together for greater code...

On 05/27/2015 11:13 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> On 2015 May 27, at 07:42, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >>> For example, from reading different pages on how Clang PGO, it’s unclear if >>> it does “block reordering” (i.e. moving unexecuted code blocks to a distant >>> code page, leaving only ‘hot’ executed code packed together fo...

...p Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > > On 05/27/2015 11:13 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >>> >>> On 2015 May 27, at 07:42, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Lee Hunt <leehu at exchange.microsoft.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> For example, from reading different pages on how Clang PGO, it’s unclear >>>> if >>>> it does “block reordering” (i.e. moving unexecuted code blocks to a >>>> distant >>>>...