Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ledna".
Did you mean:
edna
2023 Jan 06
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
...not, but I consider samba better product and with it's open nature more versatile.
Anyway, thank you for clarification.
________________________________
Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 14:12
Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>
P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 12:18, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> It works for us without problems. We would...
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
...ike to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba.
________________________________
Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 12:15
Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>
P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 10:13, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we sync our password from oth...
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 12:18, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> It works for us without problems. We would like to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba.
No, would you ask this question about Microsoft AD ?
Rowland
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 10:13, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we sync our password from other system by directly setting unicodePwd in samba database file. We would like to drop the insecure hash stored in other system and replace it with something newer and more robust.
>
> Documentation on page
2006 Jan 13
9
loading zaptel drivers automatically upon reboot
Just installed Asterisk 1.2 on a brand new clean machine running
RedHat 9.0. I have a TDM400 card inside. When I boot, the card seems
dead. When I do:
modprobe wctdm
modprobe Zaptel
the lights come on and all seems fine, until I reboot that is...
After a reboot I have to repeat the modprobe.
I shouldn't have to do a modprobe every re-boot should I? How do you
get the drivers to load