search for: leblancnet

Hello, I have enough details on how to have Linux users authenticate to a 2003r2 AD, but I need help getting their home dir's to automatically mount to a windows share. Any details would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, James

...computing.de> * BUG 6655: Fix 'smbcontrol smbd ping'. o Bj?rn Jacke <bj at sernet.de> * BUG 6105: Make linking of rpcclient --as-needed safe. o Matt Kraai <mkraai at beckman.com> * BUG 6630: Fix opening of sockets on QNX. o Robert LeBlanc <robert at leblancnet.us> * BUG 6700: Use dns domain name when needing to guess server principal. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 5886: Fix password change propagation with ldapsam. * BUG 6585: Fix unqualified "net join". * BUG 6611: Fix a valgrind error in chain_reply....

...computing.de> * BUG 6655: Fix 'smbcontrol smbd ping'. o Bj?rn Jacke <bj at sernet.de> * BUG 6105: Make linking of rpcclient --as-needed safe. o Matt Kraai <mkraai at beckman.com> * BUG 6630: Fix opening of sockets on QNX. o Robert LeBlanc <robert at leblancnet.us> * BUG 6700: Use dns domain name when needing to guess server principal. o Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> * BUG 5886: Fix password change propagation with ldapsam. * BUG 6585: Fix unqualified "net join". * BUG 6611: Fix a valgrind error in chain_reply....

I've looked around and can't find the answer. We have a Samba file server joined to our Active Directory and using ACLs. We are enforcing quotas on this machine, but when specifying the home directory, the directory is owned by the person who created it. Using Windows and going into the security permissions, there doesn't seem to be a way to remove the owning user/group. When you hit

What is the milestone that will get 3.5 into Debian Squeeze? Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University

Ok, here is the set-up. We have a domain that is the main domain, it handles DHCP and DNS for domain.edu. The DNS for domain.edu has NS records to delegate domain.local to our Active Directory. I am able to bind a machine just fine to the Active Directory without having to change any of the client DNS settings (which poing to domain.edu). File services work fine. I'm trying to work out single

Hi all, According to this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566977 This particular error is actually a bug in the samba code. Does anyone know if there are patches that fix this ? Adding "allow_weak_crypto = true" to /etc/krb5.conf does not solve this for me :( Has anyone got a working solution for this ? -Alex IMPORTANT: This email remains the

Hello everyone. I been working up with samba shared folders, but have some troubles with users/folder privileges. Users: ale jvillar I got a folder named "BACKUP" users ale and jvillar can read/write this folder inside "BACKUP" is another folder named "MAIL BACKUP" i want user ale to read/write this folder and user jvillar only read. Even though i tried everything i

Hi, I'm using a domain where the DNS is hosted by a couple of domain controllers on the network, outside of my control. I do have ability to work with group policy and active directory users and computers. I was able to join a samba/linux computer to the domain using 'net rpc join -S <IP of local DC/DNS server>'. This caused an entry for the computer to show up in Active

Hello samba gurus, I have a couple of questions regarding Linux file systems, and their ability to mimic NTFS, and the other question is regarding winbind and its uncanny ability to virtually lock up a samba AD member server once connectivity to the AD is lost. I apologize if anyone gets annoyed by this question. Environment: I am using samba 3.2 with XFS+ACL support joined as a AD domain member

I'm wondering if I'm seeing a regression of 5616 with 3.4.8. I'm trying to set-up pptpd with winbind, which I'm doing on two machines on Debian lenny, and I'm trying on Debian Squeeze now. The Windows client is saying "Error 778: It was not possible to verify the identity of the server." The logs say that everything is ok, and that the client is hanging up the

I've been trying to get Kerberos to work for the last couple of days so that we can use SSO. I can't seem to get past a roadblock and Google doesn't seem to provide any answers. I've got Samba connected to the AD and running. I can wbinfo everything and can login to the machine using PAM with the pam_winbind modules just fine. I can get user tickets just fine. When I try to get ssh

I was looking through the change log of 3.3.0 and noticed that a new idmap_hash was introduced that seems to play well with trusted domains. What means are available to convert all my rids to this new hash so I can update file permissions? Thanks, Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University

Ok, I can't seem to search for the right thing to get what I need. I'm looking for a solution where if quota or some other mailing system needs to send an email to an Active Directory user, that it uses the email address listed in Active Directory for that user. We are connected to Active Directory using winbind, on one system we are using pam_winbind, on another we are not. Of course,

I wonder if I am seeing the problem mentioned here http://old.nabble.com/samba-3.2-breaks-ppp-winbind-plugin-td18715806.html. I can connect a WIndows PPTP client just fine if using chap-secrets, but when I use the winbind plugin, the client says that it can not authenticate the server (both are on the same domain). They said it was resolved in 3.2, but we are using 3.4.3. Is it possible this bug

We have a user trying to share a OneNote 2007 notebook and it takes minutes to load a 20 KB notebook. I've opened a 500 KB Excel spreadsheet from the same share and it took seconds. Has anyone else run into this problem? We are running Samba 3.4.8 on Debian Squeeze. Thanks, Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University

I'm trying to think about how to setup a Samba system and would like to pick the brains of some experts. We are looking up put a large amount of storage ~75TB in a central data center. We have some remote (ok, not remote, but across slower links, ok if you consider several hundred clients over 1Gb to be slow) locations that we would like to set up samba servers that 'cache' the file

I''ve been using btrfs as a spool space on our back-up server to get familiar with it and things work fine until the volume fills up. Our backup software (bacula) usually spools until the volume is full, then despools and respools, etc. With btrfs, it fills up and bacula thinks there is still space so it keeps trying and then finally errors out. I thought this was a problem because I was

In 1.6.0, when creating a MDT, you could specify multiple --mgsnode options and it would failover between them. 1.6.3 only seems to take the last one and --mgsnode=192.168.1.252 at o2ib:192.168.1.253 at o2ib doesn''t seem to failover to the other node. Any ideas how to get around this? Robert Robert LeBlanc College of Life Sciences Computer Support Brigham Young University leblanc at