search for: lebedev

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:59 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:48 PM Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > After talking with some NPM people, I believe the ultimate goal after > NPM is enabled by default is to only support `-passe...

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:32 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. Any further thoughts here? > > To recap - i don't really see how this can be a demandedbits problem - we do > demand all those bits, we just know they must be zero. > (i would love to be proven wrong though!) > > Roman. &g...

...n, Paul via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lldb-dev <lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Tom > Stellard > > via lldb-dev > > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:42 AM > > To: Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> > > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > >; > > Florian Hahn <florian_hahn at apple.com>; LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org > > > > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-d...

On 03/17/2020 06:39 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 03/16/2020 11:09 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:07 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev >>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>...

...idering Petal.Width and Species as nuisance variables... Therefor my code should be: try = glm(Sepal.Length~Sepal.Width - Petal.Length - Species, data=iris); Sorry if it looks stupid... But I didn't manage to find any information on nuisance variables in R... -- *Best Regards,* *Alexander Lebedev* Stavanger University Hospital, Dept. of Psychiatry, 4011, Armauer Hansens vei 20, Stavanger, Norway. researcher [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello I'm looking for a wayy to modify extensions.conf It seems that PutConfig AMI command is not supposed to work on extensionsq.conf Any ideas? Thanks Vadim

...ould know about the affected buildbots and whether it's fine to upgrade them or whether their configurations reflect some important use cases. Sylvestre should know if the release process for LLVM on Ubuntu/Debian relies on the older GCC toolchains somehow. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hmm, i guess i should have mailed cfe-dev too. Doing that now. > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > As per[1], gcc-4.8 is the oldest support...

...= sub i32 0, %b %res2 = OP i32 %sub, %a theoretically, we can still do the following transform for the above pattern: %res2 = OP i32 %sub, %a ==> %res2 = sub i32 0, %res Not sure whether we can do it in instCombine. Thanks. BRS// Chen Zheng Power Compiler Backend Developer From: Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> To: Zheng CZ Chen <czhengsz at cn.ibm.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Date: 2018/12/18 03:45 PM Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] should we do this time-consuming transform in InstCombine? On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Zheng CZ Chen via llvm-dev &lt...

05.07.2020, 05:22, "Roman Lebedev" <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and...

No objections from me to make it run later. I didn't see the potential conflicts when I added that code. Delayed combine, custom lowering, or DAGToDAGISel all seem like viable options to me. On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:04 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > I have previously posted these two patches: > > [X86][CodeGen][NFC] Delay `combineIncDecVector()` from DAGCombine to > X86DAGToDAGISel > https://reviews.llvm.org/D62327 > > [DAGCombine][X86][AArch64][AMDGPU][MIPS][PPC] (sub x, c) ->...

> On Dec 9, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yep, there seems to be an issue with commits containing non-ASCII > symbols (in Author: line?) Ah, perhaps, but I don’t seen anything obvious, at least not in the log. And the author has other commits just before and after that did generate a m...

Hmm, i guess i should have mailed cfe-dev too. Doing that now. On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > As per[1], gcc-4.8 is the oldest supported *major* gcc version. > But what about minor/patch versions? > > When https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779 was initially committed, > a few[2][3] buildbots failed. As i have now looked into th...

> On Jun 30, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The idea of adding an “incubation” stage to projects in the LLVM world seems to be positively received. I also noticed that...

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM David Greene via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > What is the practical plan to enforce the lack of merges? When we > > looked into this GitHub would not support this unless also forcing > > every change to go through a pull request (i.e. no pre-receive hooks >

...lt;mydeveloperday at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> See the "Draft Mode" changes, might be related >>> https://secure.phabricator.com/w/changelog/2020.16/ >>> >>> MyDeveloperDay >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:32 PM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:29 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Please assume good faith -- I'm pretty sure this i...

On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:59, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > It appears you need 'reassoc' on fmul/fadd: > https://godbolt.org/z/nuTzx2 Thanks very much, that was it. Either that or providing -enable-unsafe-fp-math to llc yielded FMAs. I didn't expect this since using FMAs here instead of mul/a...

...document you meant to share. It looks like a one pager on ML in Swift. > > Thomas > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:05 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > >> On Jun 30, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com <mailto:lebedev.ri at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> The idea of adding an “...

...t;cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com>; Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>; Andrea Bocci <andrea.bocci at cern.ch>; Elovikov, Andrei <andrei.elovikov at intel.com>; Alexey Bataev <a.bataev at hotmail.com>; nd <nd at arm.com>; Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>; Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>; Shawn Landden <slandden at gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFC: Interface user provided vector functions with the vectorizer. I mean, the FE will create only one of the 3 vector versions matching the one we want for...

Hi. As per[1], gcc-4.8 is the oldest supported *major* gcc version. But what about minor/patch versions? When https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779 was initially committed, a few[2][3] buildbots failed. As i have now looked into the issue: * but it is *REPRODUCIBLE* with gcc-4.8.4 and gcc-4.9.2 from debian oldstable (Jessie). * it is *NOT* reproducible with gcc-4.8.5 and gcc-4.9.3 from ubuntu 16.04,

...hing, so Known can only be passed from callee to the caller. This is why i'm asking whether anyone is concerned if we proceed with https://reviews.llvm.org/D68150 On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:44 PM Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:57 PM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks for taking a look! >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:09 PM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> > On 9/27/19 1:40 PM, Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev wrote: >> > > In htt...