search for: leapfrogging

Dear List Is there a package for leapfrog plotting (Hamiltonian Monte Carlo estimation) in R? I tried the actual "LEAPFrOG" package which doesn't actually give the plot like this one? http://xianblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/hamilton.jpg How doe one plot this in R? So, there semi-circle and dots on that semi-circle. I don't think curve() or plot() would produce such plot.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130 Summary: segfault on connect / Red Hat 6.1 w/OpenSSL 0.9.6c Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.0.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

> And where do we get this? Saw nothing on the speex website... http://www.openacm.org/ --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to

Hi, everyone. I was able to get the Ajax.Request basically working, such that it returns "Damn! You are beyond #10...", but I had to change the "/proxy? url=" to "http://localhost/myApp/proxy.html?url=". Apparently, the response is just my proxy.html page. With "/proxy?url=" in place, WebSphere shows an error: SRVE0017W: A WebGroup/Virtual Host to handle

>*nod* That's been the historic ELF+DWARF approach, but both MacOS (with dsyms+DWARF) and Windows >(COFF+CodeView+PDB) don't do it that way, and instead involve the linker to a degree. >Mostly I'm wondering if it'd be reasonable to (and if anyone would be interested in doing it) do >something more like the PDB support - fully debug-aware linking. Honestly saying I only

...ertain that -ffunction-sections is not a viable solution as it exists and is well supported in other toolchains and environments. 2) We should talk to other ELF producers and coordinate to make sure we don't end up creating a twisty maze of extensions here. 3) We should step back and consider leapfrogging to a fully specialized format to reap even more performance benefits rather than messily patching ELF. #3 may prove irrelevant if this is the only major hurdle for speeding up ELF links. My impression was otherwise. #2 hasn't been done by the other ELF producers, but we should strive to do b...

...ctions. > 2) We should talk to other ELF producers and coordinate to make sure we > don't end up creating a twisty maze of extensions here. This is not a problem with the general ELF community since the binutils ld/gold would not atomize sections. > 3) We should step back and consider leapfrogging to a fully specialized > format to reap even more performance benefits rather than messily patching > ELF. I dont think we should come up with another object file format. Shankar Easwaran

>If you're interested in things you can do in the linker for this - you might consider something more aggressive: Fully DWARF aware deduplication. > >This could be done hopefully by reusing some of the code in the dsymutil implementation in LLVM. > >This would be much more effective (and without the possible context-sensitive tradeoffs) than using type units. >Though

...rallel random number generators provided by TRNG can be manipulated by jump and split operations. These allow to jump ahead by an arbitrary number of steps and to split a sequence into any desired sub-sequence(s), thus enabling techniques suitable to parallel algorithms, such as block-splitting and leapfrogging. The package provides the R user with access to the functionality of the underlying TRNG C++ library. It embeds TRNG sources and headers and makes them available to other projects combining R with C++. Beyond this, rTRNG exposes the creation, manipulation and use of pseudo-random streams to R, via...

...rallel random number generators provided by TRNG can be manipulated by jump and split operations. These allow to jump ahead by an arbitrary number of steps and to split a sequence into any desired sub-sequence(s), thus enabling techniques suitable to parallel algorithms, such as block-splitting and leapfrogging. The package provides the R user with access to the functionality of the underlying TRNG C++ library. It embeds TRNG sources and headers and makes them available to other projects combining R with C++. Beyond this, rTRNG exposes the creation, manipulation and use of pseudo-random streams to R, via...

Your distro's wine package will not, in general be the latest available Wine version but, if the distro maintainers aren't asleep at the switch, this should be upgraded every few weeks. I have two RedHat Fedora releases installed because I play distro leapfrog on my two Linux boxes. The last time I explicitly installed Wine on either box was when I did a clean Linux install of the

I''m in the process of setting up our puppet environment, and am creating dummy classes so that I can test/use our node classification script, however my dummy classes are throwing the following error. puppetmasterd[3908]: Could not parse for environment production: Syntax error at ''Stage_cis2'' at /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/ Stage_cis2.pp:2 As you see, the actual

> >slyzen wrote: >> I'm running wine 1.1.23 on a kubuntu jaunty and my iTunes 8.2 doesn't see my iPhone (with OS 3.0). Do you think your method will work in my case ? > >No, itunes doesn't see any devices on Wine. It wants to talk directly to a USB device with special drivers. > Isn't there an unsupported version of Wine that will do this until the code is

(This message was originally written on StackOverflow -- the formatting is much prettier there -- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1283046/problem-with-setter-override-on-activerecord) This is not exactly a question, it''s rather a report on how I solved an issue with write_attribute when the attribute is an object, on Rails'' Active Record. I hope this can be useful to others

As far as I work out the version of the Dom0 linux kernel has to be 2.6.18. This is causing me a lot of problem, because the driver support in 2.6.18 is slowly falling behind, and I finding that more modern hardware isn''t supported by the 2.6.18 drivers. Is it possible to use a more recent version of the kernel for Dom0, or am I stuck with 2.6.18? Is there another way I can use more

...shouldn't try to reach consensus throughout the larger community before changing the way in which Clang writes ELF files and LLD reads them. We really do need to maintain interoperability (by and large) with other toolchains on the same platform. > > 3) We should step back and consider leapfrogging to a fully specialized >> format to reap even more performance benefits rather than messily patching >> ELF. >> > I dont think we should come up with another object file format. OK, there are others who disagree though. =] It is at least something that we shouldn't write...

...Swedish language support. Some support for Canadian and southern US dialects is implemented, and will be finished by release time. --- o --- In addition to these revolutionary features, Asterisk Service Provider Edition will contain full T.39 faxing (leapfrogging systems that only support up to version 38), the Codename Pomengranade SIP Stack, the Project Okapi IAX3 trunking technology featuring IAX3 over SS7 transport, the VoipVote digital phone voting system with app_preselect cheating technology and a fully working version of the VirtuAST virtual PBX h...

Rails Core Weekly July 16 - August 6 Rails Core Weekly summarizes the rails-core mailing list, a list dedicated to Ruby on Rails internals and its development. RCW is brought to you by Rodney Ramdas and proofread by the good people of The Caboose (http://blog.caboo.se/) for accuracy. RSS feed and RCW home: http://www.pinupgeek.com/articles/category/rails-core-weekly-news The ruby on rails

On 7/30/2013 5:43 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > >> On 7/29/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote: >>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: >>>> Is there any reason -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections wouldn't work? If it'll work, it may be be better to say "if you want to get a better linker

On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > On 7/29/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: >>> Is there any reason -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections wouldn't work? If it'll work, it may be be better to say "if you want to get a better linker output use these options", rather than defining new ELF