search for: leap_second

hi, Index: leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R =================================================================== --- leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R (revision 68608) +++ leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R (working copy) @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ "1979-12-31", "1981-6-30...

sorry, i didnt watch src/main/datetime.c ... Index: leap_second/src/main/datetime.c =================================================================== --- leap_second/src/main/datetime.c (????? 68608) +++ leap_second/src/main/datetime.c (?????) @@ -303,14 +303,15 @@ } #ifndef HAVE_POSIX_LEAPSECONDS -/* There have been 25 leapseconds: see .leap.seconds...

..., I was working on this. There are other changes needed in src/main/datetime.c and ?.leap.seconds which I will commit shortly, and the example in hist.POSIXt() needed alteration (it seems DJM did not run 'make check'!). On 01/07/2015 06:20, Ei-ji Nakama wrote: > hi, > > Index: leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R > =================================================================== > --- leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R (revision 68608) > +++ leap_second/src/library/base/R/zdatetime.R (working copy) > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ > "1979-12...

As R is sophisticated enough to track leap seconds, ?.leap.seconds we'd need to update our codes real soon now again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second (and those of you who want second precision in R in 2017 need to start working with 'R patched' or 'R devel' ...)