search for: leafsize

...3",3),rep("var4",3),rep("var5",3),rep("var1",3),rep("var2",3),rep("var3",3),rep("var4",3),rep("var5",3),rep("var1",3),rep("var2",3),rep("var3",3),rep("var4",3),rep("var5",3)) leafsize<-c(12.952971,14.183247,14.894708,12.623053,11.053027,14.062297,5.974159,5.273493,7.450258,6.030390,6.412735,6.867507,6.227527,7.153695,6.414014,19.856307,21.966194,21.445263,18.100480,17.887656,17.444490,11.355896,12.246672,11.462910,12.484537,11.742058,11.937823,16.838480,15.412491,17.789735,11...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807905 Currently if you specify the blocksize parameter to mkfs-opts with a btrfs filesystem, then it fails, because mkfs.btrfs interprets the -b option as meaning filesystem size. The first patch fixes this by disallowing blocksize (it cannot be mapped meaningfully into btrfs parameters). The second patch adds the full /sbin/mkfs.btrfs utility to the

...1: Error: The implementation ../ocaml/guestfs.ml does not match the interface ../ocaml/guestfs.cmi: Values do not match: external mkfs_btrfs : t -> ?allocstart:int64 -> ?bytecount:int64 -> ?datatype:string -> ?leafsize:int -> ?label:string -> ?metadata:string -> ?nodesize:int -> ?sectorsize:int -> string array -> unit = "ocaml_guestfs_mkfs_btrfs_byte" "ocaml_guestfs_mkfs_btrfs" is not included in val mkfs_btrfs :...

...(key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY && + key.type != BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY)) { path->slots[0]++; continue; } bytenr = key.objectid; - num_bytes = key.offset; + if (key.type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY) + num_bytes = key.offset; + else + num_bytes = root->leafsize; if (btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, path->slots[0]) > sizeof(*ei)) { ei = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], diff --git a/btrfstune.c b/btrfstune.c index 6e68bda..74ee8eb 100644 --- a/btrfstune.c +++ b/btrfstune.c @@ -81,11 +81,28 @@ int enable_extrefs_flag(struct btrfs_root *root)...

I''m sorry, theres no excuse for this sort of work. We need to use root->leafsize since eb may be NULL. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index e8b5027..19d7e63 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk...

Since 2.6.29-rc1 contains btrfs I had to try it. However the loopback mount of my btrfs formatted file fails: user@host:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=btrfs.img bs=1MB count=512 user@host:~$ mkfs.btrfs btrfs.img fs created label (null) on btrfs.img nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 488.28MB Btrfs v0.16+da35ab2b0b54 user@host:~$ sudo mount -t btrfs -o loop btrfs.img /mnt/btrfs mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock Is this version of mkfs.btrfs compatible with the kernel module in 2.6.29-rc1? Any help is appreciated. Regards, Peter. -...

...a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index f2bbcc8..2a33a55 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int create_metadump(const char *input, FILE *out, int num_threads, int ret; root = open_ctree(input, 0, 0); + BUG_ON(!root); BUG_ON(root->nodesize != root->leafsize); ret = metadump_init(&metadump, root, out, num_threads, -- 1.7.11.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...stg-bot ~ # echo 256 > /sys/block/sdb/queue/max_sectors_kb > [140523]stg-bot ~ # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb > > WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL > WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using > > fs created label (null) on /dev/sdb > nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 2.73TB > Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 > [140532]stg-bot ~ # mount /dev/sdb /mnt > [140540]stg-bot ~ # umount /mnt > [140543]stg-bot ~ # cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb > > /sys/block/sdb/queue/max_sectors_kb > [140710]stg-bot ~ # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb &g...

Hi, Question is pretty simple: "How to change node size and leaf size on previously created partition?" Now, I know what most people will say: "you should''ve be smarter while typing mkfs.btrfs". Well, I''m intending to convert in place ext4 partition but there seems to be no option for leaf and node size in this tool. If it''s not possible I guess

...o straight to * the shared error handling then. */ - if (ret == 0) + if (ret == 0) { ret = reserve_metadata_bytes(root, block_rsv, to_reserve, flush); + if (ret && root->fs_info->quota_enabled) { + btrfs_qgroup_free(root, num_bytes + + nr_extents * root->leafsize); + } + } if (ret) { u64 to_free = 0; @@ -4805,10 +4810,6 @@ int btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(struct inode *inode, u64 num_bytes) btrfs_ino(inode), to_free, 0); } - if (root->fs_info->quota_enabled) { - btrfs_qgroup_free(root, num_bytes + - nr_e...

...al of 48 1 TB disks. With 24 disks in the btrfs: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sd[b-y] WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using adding device /dev/sdc id 2 ... adding device /dev/sdy id 24 fs created label (null) on /dev/sdb nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 21.83TB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 fsck.btrfs runs fine: # sudo fsck.btrfs /dev/sdb found 36864 bytes used err is 0 total csum bytes: 0 total tree bytes: 36864 total fs tree bytes: 4096 btree space waste bytes: 26174 file data blocks allocated: 0 referenced 0 Btrfs Btrfs v0.19...

...} @@ -1170,8 +1198,8 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) u64 dev_block_count = 0; u64 blocks[7]; u64 alloc_start = 0; - u64 metadata_profile = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP; - u64 data_profile = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0; + u64 metadata_profile = 0; + u64 data_profile = 0; u32 leafsize = getpagesize(); u32 sectorsize = 4096; u32 nodesize = leafsize; @@ -1303,11 +1331,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) } } if (mixed) { - if (!metadata_profile_opt) - metadata_profile = 0; - if (!data_profile_opt) - data_profile = 0; - if (metadata_profile != data_profile) { fp...

...44 index 0000000..f506665 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/mkfs.btrfs.8.in @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +.TH MKFS.BTRFS 8 +.SH NAME +mkfs.btrfs \- create an btrfs filesystem +.SH SYNOPSIS +.B mkfs.btrfs +[ \fB\-A\fP\fI alloc-start\fP ] +[ \fB\-b\fP\fI byte-count\fP ] +[ \fB \-d\fP\fI data-profile\fP ] +[ \fB \-l\fP\fI leafsize\fP ] +[ \fB \-L\fP\fI label\fP ] +[ \fB \-m\fP\fI metadata profile\fP ] +[ \fB \-n\fP\fI nodesize\fP ] +[ \fB \-s\fP\fI sectorsize\fP ] +[ \fB \-h\fP ] +[ \fB \-V\fP ] \fI device\fP [ \fI device ...\fP ] +.SH DESCRIPTION +.B mkfs.btrfs +is used to create an btrfs filesystem (usually in a disk parti...

...er_incompat_flags(super, flags); - printf("Setting RAID5/6 feature flag\n"); + features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID56; } + process_fs_features(features); + flags |= features; + btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(super, flags); + printf("fs created label %s on %s\n\tnodesize %u leafsize %u " "sectorsize %u size %s\n", label, first_file, nodesize, leafsize, sectorsize, -- 1.8.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kern...

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply

...struct btrfs_key defrag_max; int defrag_running; - int defrag_level; char *name; int in_sysfs; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 0cf1781..e2ebc47 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u32 sectorsize, root->stripesize = stripesize; root->ref_cows = 0; root->track_dirty = 0; + root->in_radix = 0; + root->clean_orphans = 0; root->fs_info = fs_info; root->objectid = objectid; @@ -930,7 +932,6 @@ static int __setup_root(u32 nodesize, u32 leafsize, u3...

...8388604 0 -1 /dev/sdc8 partition 9765884 0 -2 # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc8 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc8 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 9.31GB Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 # btrfs fi sh /dev/sdc8 Label: none uuid: fc0bdbd0-7eed-460f-b4e9-131273b66df2 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 28.00KB devid 1 size 9.31GB used 989.62MB path /dev/sdc8 Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 # But we sho...

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]# cd /mnt/btra [root@localhost btra]# touch {1..10} [root@localhost btra]# btrfs subvolume snapshot . snap Create a snapshot of ''.'' in ''./snap'' [ro...

Hello everyone. This is the support for default single-device configuration. Subvolumes are _allowed_. Transparent compression is not allowed. Leafsize != 4K is not allowed. Nodesize != 4K is not allowed. Grub-0.97+btrfs doesn''t understand exotic things like preallocated extents (e.g. files composed by fallocate(2), posix_fallocate(3)). Also grub-0.97 doesn''t check btrfs checksums. In such configurations btrfs_stage1_5 doesn'...

hi,sir I creat the filesystem with command mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda2, and it returns fs created label (null) on /dev/sda2 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 2.93GB then I mount the /dev/sda2 with command mount -t btrfs /dev/sda2 /btrfs/, it returns mount: /dev/sda2: can''t read superblock. Why? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vg...