search for: leafblock1

...ue ] Unfortunately, this generates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6 PowerPC backend: LBB_matches_1: ; regex6 lbz r4, 0(r3) LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1 rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 cmpwi cr0, r4, 98 beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ; ret_true b LBB_matches_5 ; NewDefault LBB_matches_4: ; LeafBlock rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 cmpwi cr0, r4, 97 beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ; ret_true LBB_matches_5: ; NewDe...

...%tmp8 %tmp10 = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %tmp9, align 4 %tmp13 = zext i32 %tmp10 to i64 %tmp14 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %arg2, i64 %tmp13 %tmp16 = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %tmp14, align 16 %Pivot = icmp slt i32 %tmp16, 2 br i1 %Pivot, label %LeafBlock, label %LeafBlock1 LeafBlock: ; preds = %entry %SwitchLeaf = icmp eq i32 %tmp16, 1 br i1 %SwitchLeaf, label %unreachable0, label %unreachable1 LeafBlock1: ; preds = %entry %SwitchLeaf2 = icmp eq i32 %tmp16, 2 br i1 %SwitchLeaf2, la...

...ates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6 > PowerPC backend: > > LBB_matches_1: ; regex6 > lbz r4, 0(r3) > LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock > rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 > blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock > LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1 > rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmpwi cr0, r4, 98 > beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ; ret_true > b LBB_matches_5 ; NewDefault > LBB_matches_4: ; LeafBlock > rlwinm r4, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmpwi cr0, r4, 97 > beq cr0, LBB_matches_8 ;...

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Eric Kidd wrote: > Hello! I'm compiling code which uses pointers as iterators. For some > reason--probably a silly misunderstanding of the docs--I can't eliminate > duplicate pointer loads. I'll probably figure this out eventually, but if > somebody else sees the answer instantly, I certainly won't complain. :-) There are no stupid questions.

Hello! I'm compiling code which uses pointers as iterators. For some reason--probably a silly misunderstanding of the docs--I can't eliminate duplicate pointer loads. I'll probably figure this out eventually, but if somebody else sees the answer instantly, I certainly won't complain. :-) Here are the optimizers I'm running: opt -f -simplifycfg -dce -instcombine