search for: ldionne

...but I wanted to clarify that you don’t need to sudo.) From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 2:06 PM To: "ldionne at apple.com" <ldionne at apple.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Libc++ Dev <libcxx-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Bumping the CMake requirement for libc++ and libc++abi Wanting to use new features is a good reason...

...duce this sort of friction. > > > > Thanks, > > Christopher Tetreault > > > > > > *From:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> *On Behalf Of *Mehdi > AMINI via llvm-dev > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 9:06 AM > *To:* Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake > version > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:02 AM Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> wrote: > > > > > >...

...h before we assume that > this is the case. > > > > *From:* Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > *Cc:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com>; > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake > version > > > > Hi All, > > > > Throwing a couple of comments in: > > > > Chris's position here has a lot of good points an...

...t probably makes sense to confirm with MS though before we assume that this is the case. From: Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Cc: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version Hi All, Throwing a couple of comments in: Chris's position here has a lot of good points and we want to make sure we're not raising the barrier too high. I defin...

...out people starting to push merge commits and unsquashed commits upstream, resulting in a messy history. I had volunteered to write a hook that would check for the absence of merge commits in the set of commits being pushed upstream, which I did. The hook is available here: https://gist.github.com/ldionne/2c260ce2081db74206e074e09cff71d0 <https://gist.github.com/ldionne/2c260ce2081db74206e074e09cff71d0>. If there is any interest for something like this, the code’s there. Cheers, Louis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/p...

...h before we assume that > this is the case. > > > > *From:* Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > *Cc:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com>; > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake > version > > > > Hi All, > > > > Throwing a couple of comments in: > > > > Chris's position here has a lot of good points an...

...r <echristo at gmail.com<mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> Cc: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com<mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com<mailto:ldionne at apple.com>>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version Hi All, Throwing a couple of comments in: Chris's position here has a lot of good points...

I just landed these patches: commit c55051eea5d3cd57abfd9727f519b670517704d9 Author: Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> Date: Thu Jun 25 12:02:43 2020 -0400 [libunwind] Allow specifying custom Lit config files This is the libunwind counterpart of 0c66af970c80. commit 33c9c10d183371edc95fa936705bef56f55ab611 Author: Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> Date:...

...*Sent:* Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com > <mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> > *Cc:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com > <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com > <mailto:ldionne at apple.com>>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum > required CMake version > > Hi All, > >...

...make more progress on setting up the common CMake infrastructure. Does that make sense? Sure, I agree. It is indeed difficult to make time for (and justify) improving to the build system. I'll take a look if you send a patch. Louis > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:42 PM Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com <mailto:ldionne at apple.com>> wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2020, at 15:28, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com <mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> From the "not largely affected" camp: >> >> - the churn doesn't f...

...r <echristo at gmail.com<mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 12:41 PM To: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>> Cc: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com<mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>>; Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com<mailto:ldionne at apple.com>>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version Hi All, Throwing a couple of comments in: Chris's position here has a lot of good points...

...e upgrade? You’re tying the upgrade to after the branch, which is pretty standard, but e.g. if we wanted to upgrade to 3.8.0 now and then upgrade to 3.13.4 after the branch, would people be okay with that, or should we limit upgrades to just shortly after a branch? > > > > From: <ldionne at apple.com <mailto:ldionne at apple.com>> on behalf of Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com <mailto:ldionne at apple.com>> > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 7:20 AM > To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com <mailto:smeenai at fb.com>> > Cc: "llvm-dev at...

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 4, 2020, at 12:13, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> wrote: > >> Mehdi, Chris & others, >> >> I guess I did not expres...

> On Mar 25, 2020, at 19:42, Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > > I would like to just chime in and say that I’m fairly strongly opposed to any blanket version increases without justification. Having a low version requirement is a feature. It means that more people can build the codebase. We should increase the minimum CMake version requirement only if we need to do

Hi Louis, sorry for bothering you once more about the libcxx test suite! I was wondering whether you could help with some of my problems again. After the recent discussion on the mailing list and your diff, I was able to set up cross-compilation and remote-execution of the libcxx test suite, so thank you for that! We have split up the build of the libraries into different stages, so libcxx,

On 2020-03-04, Louis Dionne via llvm-dev wrote: > > >> On Mar 4, 2020, at 12:13, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com <mailto:ldionne at apple.com>> wrote: >> Mehdi, Chris & others, >> >> I guess I did not express the main reasons for wanting to switch over very well in my original message. >> >> You original message was about “ commit attribution”, but now i...

> On Sep 22, 2020, at 15:28, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > From the "not largely affected" camp: > > - the churn doesn't feel that major for HAS_ and ... > - the uniformity feels nice > > and in general feels nice and in pursuit of the longer term goals here. > > -eric > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:58 AM Petr

...M Jessica Clarke via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 30 Jun 2020, at 16:04, Louis Dionne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2020, at 13:06, Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com<mailto:ldionne at apple.com>> wrote: >>> On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:19, Louis Dionne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, so we've had some discussion on this thread, and althoug...

...around how often/when we upgrade? You’re tying the upgrade to after the branch, which is pretty standard, but e.g. if we wanted to upgrade to 3.8.0 now and then upgrade to 3.13.4 after the branch, would people be okay with that, or should we limit upgrades to just shortly after a branch? From: <ldionne at apple.com> on behalf of Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 7:20 AM To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>, Petr Hosek <phose...

On 30 Jun 2020, at 16:04, Louis Dionne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2020, at 13:06, Louis Dionne <ldionne at apple.com> wrote: >>> On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:19, Louis Dionne via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, so we've had some discussion on this thread, and although some people (including me) would like a more aggressive policy, I believe...