search for: ldflags_orig

Peter, Any objections to adding this to the trunk? When I run 'ldd upsc' without this patch, it lists the OpenSSL libraries, and the default ./configure setting is to not use OpenSSL. - Charles > Log: > If we are not using SSL_CFLAGS or SSL_LDFLAGS, do not add the OpenSSL libraries > to all of the binaries. > > > Modified: branches/deb_fixes_for_trunk/configure.in >

...2009-12-15 11:12:15.291295000 -0800 @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ if test -z "${nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen}"; then nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen=yes - dnl save CFLAGS and LDFLAGS + dnl save CPPFLAGS CFLAGS and LDFLAGS + CPPFLAGS_ORIG="${CFLAGS}" CFLAGS_ORIG="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS_ORIG="${LDFLAGS}" @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ fi AC_MSG_CHECKING(for Net-SNMP headers) + CPPFLAGS="${CPPFLAGS} ${CFLAGS}" AC_TRY_CPP([#include <net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h>], [AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) ], @@ -49,7 +51,8 @@ LIBNETSNMP_LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"...

...m embedded firmware. And one of the authors complained about NUT script for checking ssl library ignoring supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS with the desired include and library paths. I checked several scripts in m4 folder and all of them do something like this: CFLAGS_ORIG="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS_ORIG="${LDFLAGS}" CFLAGS="" LDFLAGS="..." at the beginning. Is it for purpose? Why not check first with the user-supplied variables? I'm not very good in all this autotools magic so please forgive me if this whole thing is dumb :) P.S. What is the "righ...

...hors complained about NUT script for checking > ssl library ignoring supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS with the > desired include and library paths. > I checked several scripts in m4 folder and all of them do > something like this: > > CFLAGS_ORIG=3D"${CFLAGS}" > LDFLAGS_ORIG=3D"${LDFLAGS}" > > CFLAGS=3D"" > LDFLAGS=3D"..." > > at the beginning. Is it for purpose? Why not check first with > the user-supplied variables? > > I'm not very good in all this autotools magic so please > forgive me if thi...