search for: ldap_port

...&& l < sizeof(filter) - 1; c++) { + if (*c=='%' && *(c+1)=='u') { + char *b; + for (b=user; *b && l < sizeof(filter) - 1; b++) { + filter[l++]=*b; + } + c++; + } else { + filter[l++]=*c; + } + } + + if ((ld=ldap_init(lp_ldap_server(), lp_ldap_port())) == NULL) { + rprintf(FERROR,"ldap: init failed (%s:%d)\n", lp_ldap_server(), lp_ldap_port()); + } else { + if (ldap_simple_bind_s(ld, lp_ldap_root(), lp_ldap_root_passwd()) != LDAP_SUCCESS) { + rprintf(FERROR,"ldap: bind failed %s\n", lp_ldap_root()); + } else { + if (l...

...=user; *b && l < sizeof(filter) - 1; b++) { + filter[l++]=*b; + } + c++; + } else { + filter[l++]=*c; + } + } + + if ((ld=ldap_init(lp_ldap_server(), lp_ldap_port())) == NULL) { + rprintf(FERROR,"ldap: init failed (%s:%d)\n", lp_ldap_server(), +lp_ldap_port()); + } else { + if (ldap_simple_bind_s(ld, lp_ldap_root(), lp_ldap_root_passwd()) != +LDAP_SUCCESS) { + rprintf(FERROR,"ldap: bind...

Yes, went thru that page a few times and don't see an obvious error. If I leave require strong auth as the default, then nothing works. Setting it to no allows diagnostics->authentication to return a positive result. That is also the configuration that would succeed in querying the containers. Without the 'no' setting it fails to bind. What am i missing? On September 1, 2020

This is wierd. I''m trying to get Ruby/LDAP up and working, and at least the basics work fine under irb: irb(main):001:0> require ''ldap'' => true irb(main):002:0> LDAP::Conn.new() => #<LDAP::Conn:0x1b87ac> irb(main):003:0> So far, so good. All LDAP::Conn.new does is call ldap_init with host and port parameters, which in turn just allocates the

...-18 14:39:26.000000000 +0200 +++ ldap.c 2007-09-18 14:39:29.000000000 +0200 @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ /* Otherwise setup the TCP LDAP session */ - if ( (ads->ld = ldap_open_with_timeout(ads->config.ldap_server_name, + if ( (ads->ld = ldap_open_with_timeout(inet_ntoa(ads->ldap_ip), LDAP_PORT, lp_ldap_timeout())) == NULL ) { return ADS_ERROR(LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR); At least in 3.0.22 there was something similar. Is there a reason why the name is used? Regards, Christof Musik -- * bitbone AG Tel: +49(0)931-250993-0 * Martin-Luther-Strasse 5 a Fax: +49(0)931-...

...il server is running zarafa 7.2.4 /postfix and very thing over ldapS. my setup cat server.cfg | grep user_plugin user_plugin = ldap user_plugin_config = /etc/zarafa/ldap.cfg I used the : ldap.active-directory.cfg config copied that to ldap.cfg some of my ldap.cfg ldap_host = ldap_port = 636 ldap_protocol = ldaps ldap_uri = ldaps://dc1.internal.domain.tld ldaps://dc2.internal.domain.tld ldap_bind_user = CN=SPECIAL_USERSHERE,OU=Service-Accounts,OU=MYCOMPANY ldap_bind_passwd = mysecretpassword. ldap_search_base = OU=MYCOMPANY # i limit search to only zarafaAddount enabled user...

Obviously I am missing something and I don''t know what it is... I am following the instructions at http://rubyforge.org/docman/view.php/381/114/activeldap_rb.html and also here... http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/HowtoAuthenticateViaLdap my model looks exactly like this... class LdapUser < ActiveRecord::Base ldap_mapping :dnattr => ''uid'', :prefix

hi im still running zarafa Product version: 7,2,1,51838 and when i ran the dbcheck i couldn't authenticate against ldap from zarafa webapp i'll try to upgrade to the latest samba and rerun again and see if it breaks it. Thanks for sharing your experience. Samba - General mailing list wrote > Hai, > > You can fix it, i did it here for my zarafa 7.2.3. after

Anyone have a Snom they're happy with? How did you manage that? :) I have a system of: Asterisk 1.2.3 2 Wildcard TDM400P Rev I and E/F 1 Snom 360 + sidecar ~15 Sipura/Linsys SPA-841 ~15 Grandstream 101 Everything (currently) is on the same network, not a router to be seen between any two. Also everything, except the snom, is working sweetly. The main problem is ECHO.. awful echo and