Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "lda_res".
Did you mean:
dacres
2006 Nov 11
1
predict.lda is missing ?
I'm trying to classify some observations using lda and I'm getting a
strange error. I loaded the MASS package and created a model like so:
>train <- mod1[mod1$rand < 1.7,]
>classify <- mod1[mod1$rand >= 1.7,]
>lda_res <- lda(over_win ~ t1_scrd_a + t1_alwd_a, data=train, CV=TRUE)
That works, and all is well until I try to do a prediction for the holdouts:
>lda_pred <- predict(lda_res, classify)$class
Error in predict(lda_res, classify) : no applicable method for "predict"
If I try predict.ld...
2009 Jan 06
0
Singularity of lda function in MASS package
I have two specific questions regarding the output of lda function in MASS.
#Question1:
#=========
n: sample size, p: number of variables
Some articles in the literature say that LDA is singular
for p > n-1. However, my experimentation with lda (default arguments) for
two class problems shows collinearity for p > n-2.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Does lda (MASS) use a
different