search for: lcpc

...ne with me :-), others have argued this already. You really need more first class, language-neutral, LLVM mechanisms for parallelism. I'm not pretending I know how to do this, though there are papers on the subject, including one from an Intel team (Pillar: A Parallel Implementation Language, LCPC 2007). --Vikram Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve > To mark this function as a parallel region, a module-level 'parallel' > metadata entry is created. The call site(s) of this function are marked > with this metadata,...

...ngs): [global] workgroup = PARIS server string = Serveur Samba de test load printers = no socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 encrypt passwords = true max ttl = 86500 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log syslog=0 max log size = 5000 log level=5 security = ads realm = PARIS.LCPC.FR password server = kdc1 kdc2 winbind use default domain = yes winbind cache time = 10 template shell = /bin/true template homedir = /home/%U homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 In my log.winbindd I can see, using a grep on "testuser": Got user=[t...

...approach is workable. > You > really need more first class, language-neutral, LLVM mechanisms for > parallelism. I'm not pretending I know how to do this, though there > are papers on the subject, including one from an Intel team (Pillar: > A Parallel Implementation Language, LCPC 2007). I'll look at the paper, thanks for the reference! The problem is not just in supporting parallelism in general, the problem is specifically in supporting OpenMP, with its mix of language semantics, runtime semantics, and the interaction of the two, while not inhibiting optimization. Th...

...gt; > You > > really need more first class, language-neutral, LLVM mechanisms for > > parallelism. I'm not pretending I know how to do this, though there > > are papers on the subject, including one from an Intel team (Pillar: > > A Parallel Implementation Language, LCPC 2007). > > I'll look at the paper, thanks for the reference! The problem is not > just in supporting parallelism in general, the problem is specifically > in supporting OpenMP, with its mix of language semantics, runtime > semantics, and the interaction of the two, while not inhi...

Hello. I have been trying to find an answer to a problem that has plagued our systems. I am trying to upgrade from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23c. I have been able to compile, but when I go to join it to the AD domain, I keep getting this familiar error that many others have noted but have not posted many solutions to. arcdba-> ./net ads join -U Administrator Administrator's password: Using short

Hello, I am running a fileserver with smbd here. The server is a 64bit 2.8 GHz Celeron D with 2GB RAM, running 64bit Debian, Samba version 3.0.23c. It is running as a pure fileserver so its only CPU load is serving files. The client I am doing the tests from is WinXP Pro SP2. It is connected via Intel e1000 gbit ethernet (both the server and client use e1000 chipsets). I have done a raw tcp

Hello, We recently upgraded to the latest Samba3 version v3.0.23c. If the Samba system and the AD belong to the same domain, I am able to perform a 'net ads join' by supplying either a 'Domain Admins' or a 'Domain Users' credential. However if the Samba system and the AD belong to different domain, I can perform the 'net ads join' by supplying a 'Domain