search for: lbl2

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "lbl2".

Did you mean: lbl
2014 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity in 3-way integer comparison case
...-- C-style original code --- int mycmp (int i1, int i2) { if (i1<i2) { return -1; } else if (i1>i2) { return 1; } return 0; } --- llvm code --- define i32 @mycmp(i32, i32) #0 { lbl0: %icmp.ULT = icmp ult i32 %0, %1 br i1 %icmp.ULT, label %lbl1, label %lbl2 lbl1: %merge = phi i32 [ -1, %lbl0 ], [ %., %lbl2 ] ret i32 %merge lbl2: %icmp.UGT = icmp ugt i32 %0, %1 %. = zext i1 %icmp.UGT to i32 br label %lbl1 } --- intel assembly --- 0000000000000010 <mycmp>: 10: 55 push %rbp 11: 48 89 e5...
2010 Dec 02
2
Hmisc label function applied to data frame
...d$x3) = "Variable x3" # Get correlations cormat = cor(d) # Get vector form of lower triangular elements cors = sm2vec(cormat,diag=F) inds = sm.index(cormat,diag=F) # Create a data frame var1 = dimnames(cormat)[[1]][inds[,1]] var2 = dimnames(cormat)[[2]][inds[,2]] lbl1 = label(d[,var1]) lbl2 = label(d[,var2]) cor_df = data.frame(Var1=lbl1,Var2=lbl2,Cor=cors) The issue that I run into is when trying to get the labels in lbl1 and lbl2. I get the warning: In mapply(FUN = label, x = x, default = default, MoreArgs = list(self = TRUE), : longer argument not a multiple of length of shor...
2011 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] Wrong assembly is written for x86_64 target in JIT without optimization?
...%v4 = bitcast i8* %v3 to i32* %v5 = load i32* %v4 %v6 = call i32 @yfunc(i32 1, i32 4, i32 0) %v7 = bitcast %struct.mystruct* %a2 to i8* %v8 = getelementptr i8* %v7, i32 %v6 %v9 = bitcast i8* %v8 to i32* %v10 = load i32* %v9 %op.dual.plus.uint32 = add i32 %v5, %v10 br label %lbl2 lbl2: ret i32 %op.dual.plus.uint32 } declare i32 @yfunc(i32, i32, i32) --- assembly obtained in gdb for JITted code --- 0x0000000800989bf0: push %rbp 0x0000000800989bf1: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x0000000800989bf4: sub $0x30,%rsp 0x0000000800989bf8: mov %rd...
2011 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] Wrong assembly is written for x86_64 target in JIT without optimization?
...gt; %v5 = load i32* %v4 > %v6 = call i32 @yfunc(i32 1, i32 4, i32 0) > %v7 = bitcast %struct.mystruct* %a2 to i8* > %v8 = getelementptr i8* %v7, i32 %v6 > %v9 = bitcast i8* %v8 to i32* > %v10 = load i32* %v9 > %op.dual.plus.uint32 = add i32 %v5, %v10 > br label %lbl2 > lbl2: > ret i32 %op.dual.plus.uint32 > } > > declare i32 @yfunc(i32, i32, i32) > > > --- assembly obtained in gdb for JITted code --- > 0x0000000800989bf0: push %rbp > 0x0000000800989bf1: mov %rsp,%rbp > 0x0000000800989bf4: sub...
2007 Feb 01
0
extensions.conf gotoif and label
...but I don't know if it is a good way to make a menu. I don't want to put number as it is boring to maintain. Does anyone know if there is some problem to write like this? exten => 7890,1,Wait(1) exten => 7890,n(lbl0),Read(REP|annonce|1) exten => 7890,n,GotoIf($[${REP} = 1 ] ?lbl1:lbl2) exten => 7890,n(lbl1),noop( hit 1 ! ) exten => 7890,n,system(echo you hit one) exten => 7890,n,Hangup exten => 7890,n(lbl2),GotoIf($[${REP} != 2 ] ?lbl3) exten => 7890,n,noop( hit 2 ! ) exten => 7890,n,system(echo you hit two) exten => 7890,n,Hangup exten => 7890,n(lbl3),no...
2016 Oct 10
4
Pacaging/build issues with AIX and vac (dovecot-2.2.25)
On 10-Oct-16 06:45, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Does your build end at some particular point? See **** DETAILS **** for in depth (I hope enough!) study/report. > > Aki I would guess this is not "c99" way... Making all in lib-http source='test-http-auth.c' object='test-http-auth.o' libtool=no DEPDIR=.deps depmode=xlc /bin/sh ../../depcomp xlc_r