search for: lbb0_88

...gn 4 br label %bb8 The following is the arm code generated for the above block (llc with -O0): .LBB0_26: @ %bb7 @ in Loop: Header=BB0_28 Depth=2 ldr r0, [sp, #440] add r0, r0, #1 cmp r0, r0 str r0, [sp, #288] bne .LBB0_88 b .LBB0_27 .LBB0_27: @ %bb7.split @ in Loop: Header=BB0_28 Depth=2 ldr r0, [sp, #288] str r0, [sp, #440] The code generated for x86 for the same two blocks looks like as follows (again llc with -O0): .LBB0_26:...

On 6 July 2011 02:31, D S Khudia <daya.khudia at gmail.com> wrote: >   %0 = load i32* %i, align 4 >   %HV14_ = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* %a, i32 0, i32 %0 >   %1 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* %a, i32 0, i32 %0 >   %HVCmp7 = icmp ne i32* %1, %HV14_ >   br i1 %HVCmp7, label %relExit, label %bb.split > > So that HV14_ is a new instruction and I am

On 7 July 2011 00:02, D S Khudia <daya.khudia at gmail.com> wrote: > I am trying to add a intrinsic call between the similar two instructions > which either I'll remove or convert to nop in codegen. If the two instructions are only similar in your real example, than you need to make them similar in your test, not identical. Different offsets, different array... If them two are

Hello, I am duplicating few instructions in a basic block and splitting it. The following is an example. bb: ; preds = %bb1 %0 = load i32* %i, align 4 %1 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* %a, i32 0, i32 %0 store i32 0, i32* %1, align 4 %2 = load i32* %i, align 4 %3 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* %last_added, i32 0, i32 %2 store

...# %bb # in Loop: Header=BB0_5 Depth=1 leal 972(%esp), %eax movl 568(%esp), %ecx imull $4, %ecx, %edx addl %eax, %edx imull $4, %ecx, %ecx addl %eax, %ecx cmpl %edx, %ecx movl %ecx, 508(%esp) # 4-byte Spill jne .LBB0_88 arm asm: .LBB0_1: @ %bb @ in Loop: Header=BB0_5 Depth=1 ldr r0, [sp, #444] add r1, sp, #53, 28 @ 848 add r0, r1, r0, lsl #2 cmp r0, r0 str r0, [sp, #384] bne .LBB0_88 b .LBB0_2 Thanks Daya On Wed, Jul...

Hi Renato, I am trying to add a intrinsic call between the similar two instructions which either I'll remove or convert to nop in codegen. Does that kind of seem appropriate for the purpose here? Thanks Daya On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at arm.com> wrote: > On 6 July 2011 15:57, D S Khudia <daya.khudia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Since I am