Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lazy_symbol_pointer".
2008 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] arm code generation
...tring'
combined.s:1335: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is `,'
.. repeated many times
combined.s:1366: Error: character following name is not '#'
combined.s:1370: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.indirect_symbol'
combined.s:1375: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.lazy_symbol_pointer'
combined.s:1377: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.indirect_symbol'
.. repeated a few times
combined.s:1393: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.subsections_via_symbols'
Thank you,
-aa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipe...
2008 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] arm code generation
Hello,
> combined.s:1370: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.indirect_symbol'
> combined.s:1375: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.lazy_symbol_pointer'
> combined.s:1377: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.indirect_symbol'
> .. repeated a few times
> combined.s:1393: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.subsections_via_symbols'
Looks like you've generated assembler for darwin. Provide correct target
triplet.
--
WBR, Anton Korobeynikov
2010 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation
On Monday 04 January 2010 05:16:40 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> > LLVM's TCO already handles mutual recursion.
>
> Only for fastcc functions
Yes.
> compiled with -tailcallopt, right?
If you use the compiler, yes.
> http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#tailcallopt
>
> I believe
2010 Jan 04
2
[LLVMdev] Tail Call Optimisation
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> On Monday 04 January 2010 03:33:06 Simon Harris wrote:
>> On 04/01/2010, at 3:01 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>> > I am certainly interested in tail calls because my HLVM project relies
>> > upon LLVM's tail call elimination. However, I do not understand what tail
>> > calls LLVM
2010 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] MC: Object file specific parsing
..."__DATA", "__data");
- if (IDVal == ".static_data")
- return ParseDirectiveSectionSwitch("__DATA", "__static_data");
-
- // FIXME: The section names of these two are misspelled in the assembler
- // manual.
- if (IDVal == ".non_lazy_symbol_pointer")
- return ParseDirectiveSectionSwitch("__DATA", "__nl_symbol_ptr",
- MCSectionMachO::S_NON_LAZY_SYMBOL_POINTERS,
- 4);
- if (IDVal == ".lazy_symbol_pointer")
- return ParseDi...