search for: layers

Looks like commit 05a8c47b9be8a6b8ffc091eab461fece9d40dcd0 (tests: Test all calls through multiple layers of filters and a plugin.) introduced an issue. $ git clean -dxf && autoreconf -i && ./configure && make ... in.Tpo -c -o test_layers_plugin_la-test-layers-plugin.lo `test -f 'test-layers-plugin.c' || echo './'`test-layers-plugin.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHA...

...data, with the second derived from the first. First plots to PDF as expected (title, data, legend). Second plots the data and title, but abends before drawing the legend, with > Error in if (del == 0 && to == 0) return(to) : > missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed > Calls: plot.layers.for.timestep -> image.plot -> seq -> seq.default Debugging shows image.plot.info(...) is returning > Browse[2]> info > $xlim > [1] NA > $ylim > [1] NA > $zlim > [1] NA > $poly.grid > [1] FALSE details: (Hopefully the following is not too long-winded; I&...

Hi All Somebody knows as resolv the error below? Already I compiled asterisk-addons-1.2.3, but exactly thus it reports this error, could help me? -- Executing WaitMusicOnHold("SIP/3205-d9ef", "30") in new stack -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/3205-d9ef Jun 23 02:14:21 WARNING[24960]: interface.c:215 decodeMP3: Junk at the beginning of frame

Dear Rui; Many thanks for your email. I used one of your codes, "data2$LU[which(data2$Layer == "Level 12")] <- "Park"", and it works correctly for me. Actually I need to expand the codes so as to consider all "Levels" in the "Layer" column. There are more than hundred levels in the Layer column. If I use your provided code, I have to write it

?s 22:54 de 11/06/2023, javad bayat escreveu: > Dear Rui; > Many thanks for your email. I used one of your codes, > "data2$LU[which(data2$Layer == "Level 12")] <- "Park"", and it works > correctly for me. > Actually I need to expand the codes so as to consider all "Levels" in the > "Layer" column. There are more than hundred

?s 21:05 de 11/06/2023, javad bayat escreveu: > Dear R users; > I am trying to fill a column based on a specific value in another column of > a dataframe, but it seems there is a problem with the codes! > The "Layer" and the "LU" are two different columns of the dataframe. > How can I fix this? > Sincerely > > > for (i in 1:nrow(data2$Layer)){ >

.../ However I have been using the shout_send_raw() API call because the MPEG audio header parser rejects audio that isn't Layer 3. Streaming layer 2 works in exactly the same way as Layer 3 and without any problems. Would it be possible to get src/mp3.c changed so that it accepts other layers? From (line 299): /* check for the right layer */ if (mh->layer != 2) return 0; To: /* check that layer is valid */ if (mh->layer == 0) return 0; http://www.mp3-tech.org/programmer/frame_header.html Thanks, nick.

Running 'make check' under a ThreadSanitizer build complains that test-layers leaks a pthread; while harmless, it is also an easy fix, by detaching the thread to ensure it gets cleaned up. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- tests/test-layers.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/test-layers.c b/tests/test-layers.c index 00e6...

I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists. While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing, there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers. Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and error-prone (or we wouldn't see so many violations in code reviews, eh?). Now, I understand that Google has some sort of layering checker. Could somebody...

Hello all, I'm having problems getting chan_capi 0.3.5 to work well with an Eicon Diva Server card using using the driver from linux kernel both 2.6.10 and 2.6.12 (vanilla versions). I have a (really two) producci?n system(s) running chan_capi in another identical Eicon Card using kernel 2.4.27 and the Diva Server drivers from Eicon. I installed an compiled the source level rpm

Hi all, I have learned about LLVM backend passes. LLVM IR changes its format four times until final output assembly/object through SelectionDAG, MachineInstr, MCInst. MCInst format layer seems to be called as "MC layer" officially. What about MachineInstr format layer? It seems to be called as "MI layer", is it officially? Please tell me there is good name for representing

.... I Installed wine to probe and then I installed SketchUp. In my first run, this aplication told me that it couldn't found Open GL or something like. It was fixed successfully reading in wiki wine solutions. Well, all run perfectly, but the PROBLEM is that when I open a project that have many layers, I can't manage the layer, that is to say, to select in what layer I want to work, because, despite having layers created before, the selection layer box don't show the other layers created. How can I fix this problem? Have I change regedit code? What do I have to do? Thanks to all help...

...layer as you wish, the ultimate goal is to find a position where the outer part of the nebula image is surrounding the model. When you?re satisfied, right-click this nebula texture 1 layer and choose ?create clipping mask?. Here is the effect so far: Now we can go on and add some image adjustments layers for the nebula layer, so as to make it more stand-out. >From bottom to top, we add the following image adjustment layers: (make sure you tick the ?use previous layer to create clipping mask? option for every one of them) Color Balance Levels On this Levels adjustment layer, apply the following...

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:25 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Looking at build-procedure files for link-order hints is technically > "written down" but not really human-friendly and not at all what I had in > mind. J > > I get that writing it down on a doc page will have the usual bit-rot > problems, but if you want to tell developers

On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:55 PM, "Robinson, Paul" <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists. > While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing, > there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers. > Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and error-prone > (or we wouldn't see so many violations in code reviews, eh?). > > Now, I understand that Google has some sort of layerin...

It is something that I have been wondering. When working with other application servers there is often/most of the time a 3 tiers/layers architecture: - Presentation layer/Web services - Application layer - Database layer They often resides on separate machines, 3 different sets. So the application code is logically AND physically separated from the presentation layer. Is this possible with rails? I want all my views on a set...

For reasons not relavent, I would like to create an n-tier app as follows. Data Acess layer => NHibernate Business layer => C# Presentation layer => RoR All of which might be spread across multiple machines in each layer. I am looking for the best way to allow RoR to talk to my business layer, dll''s etc hosted on another box. The RoR box might be *nix \ apache or windows

Looking at build-procedure files for link-order hints is technically "written down" but not really human-friendly and not at all what I had in mind. ☺ I get that writing it down on a doc page will have the usual bit-rot problems, but if you want to tell developers (especially newer developers) "get the layering right" you really need to point to a place that says what the

Dear R users; I am trying to fill a column based on a specific value in another column of a dataframe, but it seems there is a problem with the codes! The "Layer" and the "LU" are two different columns of the dataframe. How can I fix this? Sincerely for (i in 1:nrow(data2$Layer)){ if (data2$Layer == "Level 12") { data2$LU == "Park"

I would describe it from this angle: LLVM is layered just fine. Usually the layering is enforced as we don't link all libraries to all targets and you will notice missing symbols if you violate it. It just happens that you can violate the layering with header-only implementations of features that are not catched this way and sure enough we a handful of cases that violate the layering this way