search for: lay_of

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lay_of".

Did you mean: lay_ofs
2017 Jun 22
2
[PATCH v2 13/14] drm: stm: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...void ltdc_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > -{ > - struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); > - unsigned int i, lay; > - > - for (lay = 0; lay < ldev->caps.nb_layers; lay++) > - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) > - reg_write(ldev->regs, LTDC_L1CLUTWR + lay * LAY_OFS, > - ldev->clut[i]); > -} > - > static void ltdc_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > { > struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); > @@ -523,7 +512,6 @@ static void ltdc_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > } > > static struct drm_crt...
2017 Jun 22
0
[PATCH v2 13/14] drm: stm: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
...d *arg) * DRM_CRTC */ -static void ltdc_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc) -{ - struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); - unsigned int i, lay; - - for (lay = 0; lay < ldev->caps.nb_layers; lay++) - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) - reg_write(ldev->regs, LTDC_L1CLUTWR + lay * LAY_OFS, - ldev->clut[i]); -} - static void ltdc_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc) { struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); @@ -523,7 +512,6 @@ static void ltdc_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc, } static struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs ltdc_crtc_helper_funcs = { - .load_lut =...
2017 Jun 23
0
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/14] drm: stm: remove dead code and pointless local lut storage
..._crtc *crtc) > > -{ > > - struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); > > - unsigned int i, lay; > > - > > - for (lay = 0; lay < ldev->caps.nb_layers; lay++) > > - for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) > > - reg_write(ldev->regs, LTDC_L1CLUTWR + lay * LAY_OFS, > > - ldev->clut[i]); > > -} > > - > > static void ltdc_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > { > > struct ltdc_device *ldev = crtc_to_ltdc(crtc); > > @@ -523,7 +512,6 @@ static void ltdc_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > >...
2017 Jun 22
22
[PATCH v2 00/14] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need (when patched
2017 Jun 20
15
[PATCH 00/11] improve the fb_setcmap helper
Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. Boris and Daniel, was this approximately what you had in mind? I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but the first patch is