search for: lawyerly

Hello, Have you guys noticed that conditional validation with validates_associated does not work well when you are creating a new record? Consider this gist: https://gist.github.com/aflag/4780225 The Lawyer class has validates_associated on address conditioned on whether the Lawyer data comes from a known source or not. So, if lawyer.source equals to some string, then lawyer.address must

Hi, I have this route that let me build custom url for users like /thisismyname, and it works fine. But when I look at the log there is something I don''t like... When I hit /gregory this is what is happenning: 1. Going to public_profile#public # Good 2. hitting /assets and trying to find a user with asset token # Not good I thought my constraints would avoid this but it

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:36 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I don't want to discourage you, but you are basically asking for > interpretation of legal documents... > If you really really need to know the answer to questions like these, > the best bet is to hire legal council. Chris is right. I would add that it sounds like you are already getting nonsense responses. However,

Once upon a time, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> said: > Note that it is without doubt that ZFS was not derived from the Linux kernel > and thus cannot be a derived work. All that matters for CentOS is: 1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation of GPL+CDDL 2: Arguing about it here will not change #1 3: CentOS

Hello, I am able to install Family Lawyer 2001 using wine, but when I run the application, all I can see is the logo in the top-lefthand corner of the window. Has anyone had any luck with this software? I really don't want to have to install windows. Even vmware is a pain for me. Any suggestions will be appreciated Thanks -- Justin Hickman

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev; LLDB; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); Rafael Espíndola > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial > draft for an LLVM Code of

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > | It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities > > Not looking for that. Looking to avoid being trolled. ("Trolled" isn't > the right word here but I've lost track of what the right one is. Hopefully > my intent is clear enough.) > I'm really not

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:10:40AM -0700, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > Let's start with: In just about every country in the world, anyone > > contributing on behalf of their company are exercising their employers > > copyright (in most cases, even if they do it in

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:55:55AM -0500, Jason Warr wrote: > I think that you need to simplify #1 to: > > 1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS > > As that is really all that matters and so that people can't argue that you > are making a statement of knowledge about what/why Red Hat's lawyers have > decided. It does not matter on these lists WHY they don't ship it,

On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > On 07/06/2011 07:10 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: >> >>>> There is no need to include any notices in the binaries of an application built with clang, or some with some other application that links to the LLVM runtime libraries that are dual licensed.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > Looking through the gcc testsuite turned up an interesting edge case. Let's > assume our target leaves a hole for alignment in struct x, as do x86 and > powerpc. Do you think the following code can validly abort? > > > struct x { char c; short s; }; > int i; char *p; >

On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > Looking through the gcc testsuite turned up an interesting edge > case. Let's assume our target leaves a hole for alignment in struct > x, as do x86 and powerpc. Do you think the following code can > validly abort? No. The value of the object referred to be the left hand side must be replaced by the object on the

On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > No. Doh, you know, I was trying to find the quoted wording... What the big print giveth, the small print takes away. Ignore me... I was wrong.

Hi, Anyone using my spandsp or unicall software please note that opencall.org is shifting to soft-switch.org. HP have a line of telephony products called Opencall, which were very obscure in 1999, when I registered opencall.org. A search for "opencall" on Google back then returned only references to theatrical agents. opencall.com and opencll.net were theatrical sites. Now a search

On 07/06/2011 07:10 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Tor Gunnar Houeland wrote: > >>> There is no need to include any notices in the binaries of an application built with clang, or some with some other application that links to the LLVM runtime libraries that are dual licensed. >> Thanks for your response. Is this ability to distribute binaries without

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:16:09PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > I know this probably got answered somewhere, but I've never gotten > any when asking myself. So let me use this opportunity. > > Because I really despise useless processes and duplicated > information I always hated the way all the "mandatory" file headers. > As far as I understand it's

On 15.10.2008, at 14.01, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> With this program llvm-gcc -O2 optimizes test2 away even though it's >> address is taken in program (gcc-4.2 does not, neither does llvm-gcc >> with -O or -O0): >> >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> static const char test1 = 'x'; >> static const char

On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> I think the test case is bogus in terms of language correctness, > > Why? My gut. I listen to my gut. More seriously, C99 section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 has: > When a value is stored in an object of structure or union type, > including in a member > object, the bytes of the object representation that correspond to

Unfortunately, our lawyers say that they can't give legal advice in this context. My question would be, what are people looking for that the MIT or 2-clause BSD license don't provide? They're short, clear, widely accepted and very permissive. Another possibility might be to dual-license packages with both an OSI-approved license and whatever-else-you-like, e.g. 'MIT |

Dear Samba team, We have developed cross-platform multiprotocol intranet file searcher and it includes the module (SMB scanner for *nix) which uses libsmbclient to enumerate all files on smb shares ("uses" means including headers and linking with library). Other modules also use some external libraries, but all other libraries have LGPL license. We prefer to publish our