Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "lawjer".
Did you mean:
lawer
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims are
> not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
void then you have no permission at all to distribute any
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...binaries are clearly one 'work as
> a whole' and dynamic linkage is kind of fuzzy. US juries are
> supposed to focus on intent and are pretty unpredictable - I wouldn't
> want to take a chance on what they might decide.
Given the fact that there is not a single trustworthy lawjer in the US that
writes about the GPL and that follows your interpreation, I am relaxed.
> > These rules make many combinations a "collective work" that is
> > permitted. The cdrtools and ZFS on Linux match these rules - well, I assume
> > that the ZFS integration code f...
2015 Apr 27
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...one 'work as
>> a whole' and dynamic linkage is kind of fuzzy. US juries are
>> supposed to focus on intent and are pretty unpredictable - I wouldn't
>> want to take a chance on what they might decide.
>
> Given the fact that there is not a single trustworthy lawjer in the US that
> writes about the GPL and that follows your interpreation, I am relaxed.
It's not 'my' interpretation. Nor does my interpretation matter much.
It is the owners of the GPL licensed code that would be allowed to
claim damages if the GPL terms are not followed. And wh...