search for: lauterbach

...gt; That said, what's easiest is probably to get some form of GDB bot up > and running, and the benefit is likely to be worth the pain. Since GDB already has a good and standard test infrastructure, it'd likely get a good chunk of bad Dwarf our of the way before you start worrying about Lauterbach's specifics. Do you have a good (maybe open) Dwarf validation suite available? There is no such thing as too many tests... ;) -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/

...swords (e.g. NIS). Report and fix from HARUYAMA Seigo <haruyama at nt.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - Fix broken autoconf typedef detection. Report from Marc G. Fournier <marc.fournier at acadiau.ca> - Fix occasional crash on LinuxPPC. Patch from Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel at lauterbach.com> - Prevent typedefs from being compiled more than once. Report from Marc G. Fournier <marc.fournier at acadiau.ca> - Fill in ut_utaddr utmp field. Report from Benjamin Charron <iretd at bigfoot.com> - Really fix broken default path. Fix from Jim Knoble <jmknoble...

...swords (e.g. NIS). Report and fix from HARUYAMA Seigo <haruyama at nt.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - Fix broken autoconf typedef detection. Report from Marc G. Fournier <marc.fournier at acadiau.ca> - Fix occasional crash on LinuxPPC. Patch from Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel at lauterbach.com> - Prevent typedefs from being compiled more than once. Report from Marc G. Fournier <marc.fournier at acadiau.ca> - Fill in ut_utaddr utmp field. Report from Benjamin Charron <iretd at bigfoot.com> - Really fix broken default path. Fix from Jim Knoble <jmknoble...

Renato Golin wrote: > On 18 October 2012 02:53, Robinson, Paul <Paul.Robinson at am.sony.com> wrote: > > I had a "quality suite" at a previous job; it was the result of many PY > > of effort. It was also debugger-based, which is a mixed blessing; you > > get a lot of DWARF-parsing code for free, but then you get a lot of > > debugger bugs for free too!

> My GDB Testsuite runs have been failing more tests, and now an internal test > has started failing on some missing dwarf 3 records. What is the error message or the nature of the failures you are seeing ? Pranav Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

> > Since GDB already has a good and standard test infrastructure, it'd > > likely get a good chunk of bad Dwarf our of the way before you start > > worrying about Lauterbach's specifics. > The gdb testsuite is pretty good as a "what's expected" set of tests, > however, one thing to keep in mind is that a lot of the checks aren't > particularly fuzzy. I.e. it checks what's expected but it's not > necessarily valid dwarf that it&...

My GDB Testsuite runs have been failing more tests, and now an internal test has started failing on some missing dwarf 3 records. Changing compile flags to emit dwarf 2 didn't help. In the past there has been some effort to pass GDB Testsuite, including Dwarf 2 backwards compatibility. What is the plan/mechanism for maintaining Dwarf 2/3 compatibility? -- Rick Foos Qualcomm Innovation

The error we are getting is: "Undefined Form Value: 25" We have customers that have a variety of debuggers, and we need to be able to preserve Dwarf3 compatibility. GDB, Lauterbach, etc. The patch that caused a problem for us is: https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp?r1=162493&r2=162526&pathrev=162526&diff_format=h DW_FORM_flag_present caused the problem. The old DW_FORM_flag works for us. While the DD->u...

> > Take the log file, check out the suite, rerun a failing test, use dwarfdump > and llvm-dwarfdump, find the "bad" dwarf records produced by the compiler. > > All the eventual bugs are about dwarf records, and a gdb testsuite test to > duplicate. > That's not necessarily the case. > A bad/confused dwarf record fails multiple tests without a way to map a

On 10/18/2012 01:39 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Rick Foos<rfoos at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> On 10/18/2012 10:36 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Renato Golin<rengolin at systemcall.org> >>> wrote: >>>> On 18 October 2012 05:11, Rick Foos<rfoos at codeaurora.org> wrote:

Gerry, all: HELP! On mandriva, I compiled samba from source and got it running, but I cannot connect from windows. (see my post from earlier "[Samba] Compiling and Configuring Samba for Mandrival") I think this relates to the group/SID changes discussed in the release notes. However, I'm not smart enough to figure it out. The tarball compiled and installed fine. It

Hi, I get this error message in the log for a Win98 client which is regularly scanning a directory on the share. When this happens the client no longer can access any data in the shares (security=share), only the toplevel directory structure of a share is still accessible. This seems to be a new problem in 2.0.5/6pre (not sure if it already happened for 2.0.4). Any hints? Franz. Platform: