Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "launch_op".
Did you mean:
launch_dt
2006 Apr 14
8
[rfc] [patch] 32/64-bit hypercall interface revisited
Last year we had a discussion[1] about how the hypercall ABI
unfortunately contains fields that change width between 32- and 64-bit
builds. This is a huge problem as we come up on the python management
stack for ppc64, since the distributions ship 32-bit python. A 32-bit
python/libxc cannot currently manage a 64-bit hypervisor.
I had a patch but was unable to test it, and some other things were
2005 May 31
0
[PATCH] Store page and evtchn in start_info_t
...nst char *cmdline,
unsigned int control_evtchn,
unsigned long flags,
- unsigned int vcpus)
+ unsigned int vcpus,
+ unsigned int store_evtchn,
+ unsigned long *store_mfn)
{
dom0_op_t launch_op, op;
int initrd_fd = -1;
@@ -381,7 +392,8 @@
&vstartinfo_start, &vkern_entry,
ctxt, cmdline,
op.u.getdomaininfo.shared_info_frame,
- control_evtchn, flags, vcpus) < 0 )
+...
2005 Aug 30
4
Re: [Xen-changelog] New console transport and update xenconsoled.
...signed int vcpus,
> unsigned int store_evtchn,
>- unsigned long *store_mfn)
>+ unsigned long *store_mfn,
>+ unsigned int console_evtchn,
>+ unsigned long *console_mfn)
> {
> dom0_op_t launch_op, op;
> int initrd_fd = -1;
>@@ -707,7 +720,8 @@
> &vstack_start, ctxt, cmdline,
> op.u.getdomaininfo.shared_info_frame,
> control_evtchn, flags, vcpus,
>- store_evtchn, store_mfn) < 0 )
&...