search for: lateness

--- doc/tinc.conf.5.in | 3 +++ src/linux/device.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in index 2bfd5fe..01f7f81 100644 --- a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in +++ b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ a lookup if your DNS server is not responding. This does not affect resolving hostnames to IP addresses from the host

Instrumentation based Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) is a compiler technique that leverages important program runtime information, such as precise edge counts and frequent value information, to make frequently executed code run faster. It's proven to be one of the most effective ways to improve program performance. An important design point of PGO is to decide where to place the

Accidentally sent to uiuc server. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you compare your results with another approach: simply do not > instrument the top 1% hottest functions (by function entry count)? If this > simple approach provides most of the benefits (my measurements on one > codebase I tested show that it would eliminate

Hello I''m a final student in Malaysia. i''m doing a research about late binding(also known as dynamic binding or virtual binding). Right now i need to identify the requirement that needed to implement late binding technique. In Ruby on Rails, is there any implementation of late binding technique?if have, can you elaborate more about late binding(eg:give any example in Ruby on

*** Call for Late-breaking Posters *** Abstracts may be submitted for posters presenting recent developments and late-breaking applications of R, on topics as indicated in the earlier call for abstracts: http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/UseR-2012#Call_for_Abstracts_and_Tutorial Late-breaking posters will be displayed during the poster session alongside regular posters, and they will appear

Hi, I think these two patches are related to the topic: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41578 “[SCEV] Do not cache S -> V if S is not equivalent of V” * It’s committed. It can cause generation of redundant instructions. We’ve got regressions due to it. The biggest one is 7.31% regression in Spec2k6 401.bzip2 on Cortex-A57(AArch64). https://reviews.llvm.org/D42290 “[SCEV] Clear poison flags

I’m River and I’m a compiler engineer at PlayStation. Recently, I’ve been working on an interprocedural outlining (code folding) pass for code size improvement at the IR level. We hit a couple of use cases that the current code size solutions didn’t handle well enough. Outlining is one of the avenues that seemed potentially beneficial. -- Algorithmic Approach -- The general implementation can be

Hi all, I have deployed my Ruby On Rails application on TextDrive. At first everything seamed to be fine. However, lately, response time of my application is incredible slow. Worse, lately there is also a lot of downtime. I have contacted their support desk, however, they do not respond (at all, or very, very late). Has anyone else these experiences with TextDrive? And if so, what did you do

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Accidentally sent to uiuc server. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you compare your results

Hi Evgeny, I know of the current machine outliner in LLVM. If you look in the "More detailed performance data" in the end section it includes performance comparisons to the machine outliner. As for the algorithmic approach they are kind of similar. Machine Outliner: - Builds a suffix tree based on identical equivalence between machine instrs. - Uses target specific cost model for

Hi, I've been running tinc for a couple of months and it's great, but I have a periodic problem which maybe you guys can figure out. I operate a 3-node tinc VPN, lets say A, B and C. A / \ B --- C The problem is that after a while, node C can't exchange data with node B. It works fine (ping and other traffic) for about 10 minutes, then fails. Here is some debug

Hello Everyone, I want to raise a discussion about reasonability of late setting of nsw/nuw/nw flags to SCEV AddRecs through setNoWrapFlags method. A discussion about this have already happened in August last year, there was a concern about different no-wrap flags that come from different sequences of SCEV flags invocations. It was mentioned there that late setting of flags is actually a hack to

I get a lot of these in my log, especially when I am moving lots of traffic across the vpn: Sep 20 10:45:11 titan tinc.tdvpns[16152]: Got late or replayed packet from holden (xx.yy.zz.ww port 655), seqno 37609, last received 37610 (sequence numbers displayed generally differ by only one) What exactly is this trying to say? Surely this doesn't simply mean that the udp packets arrived in a

Lately I''ve seen a lot of Internet Server Errors while trying to use Trac. Is there a plan to do something about this, or is it time to start sending donations for a new server? ;) Kind regards, Thijs -- Fingertips - http://www.fngtps.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

[+ some folks more knowledgable about the Machine layer than me.] > On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:07 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at rt-rk.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am one of the authors of this feature. On Phabricator, we agreed to > take discussion whether encoding this in IR and threading it through the > compiler or performing a late MIR analysis is the better approach.

Hi, When using lapic as timer source the hypervisor delivers timer interrupts late. In the source xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c function create_periodic_time creates a timer element with a "bonus" of 50% of the desired time until the interrupt: pt->scheduled = NOW() + period; /* * Offset LAPIC ticks from other timer ticks. Otherwise guests which use * LAPIC ticks for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728 Summary: Rsync --min-size and --max-size filter too late in the process. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, [+ Quentin] Sorry for the late reply. > On Feb 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at rt-rk.com> wrote: > > On 12.02.2019. 18:06, Adrian Prantl wrote: >> [+ some folks more knowledgable about the Machine layer than me.] >> > That would be useful for us too! :) > > >>> On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:07 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at

On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:09 AM, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > Chris, > >> My comment was mostly in response to the Intel proposal, which effectively translates OpenMP pragmas directly into llvm intrinsics + metadata. I can't imagine a way to make this work *correctly* without massive changes to the optimizer. > > There are three ways to make this

Hi Max, On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Maxim Kazantsev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I want to raise a discussion about reasonability of late setting of > nsw/nuw/nw flags to SCEV AddRecs through setNoWrapFlags method. A discussion > about this have already happened in August last year, there was a concern > about different no-wrap flags that come from