search for: lated

--- doc/tinc.conf.5.in | 3 +++ src/linux/device.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in index 2bfd5fe..01f7f81 100644 --- a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in +++ b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ a lookup if your DNS server is not responding. This does not affect resolving hostnames to IP addresses from the host

...by using lots of small inline functions (assignment operators, getters, setters, ctors/dtors etc). Overhead of instrumenting those small functions can be very large, making training runs too slow and in some cases to usable; * Non-optimal placement of the count updates; * A third factor is related value profiling (to be turned on in the future). Small and hot callee functions taking function pointer (callbacks) can incur overhead due to indirect call target profiling. 1.1 Redundant Counter Update If checking the assembly of the instrumented binary generated by current LLVM implementation...

...ions (assignment operators, getters, setters, ctors/dtors etc). >> Overhead of instrumenting those small functions can be very large, making >> training runs too slow and in some cases to usable; >> * Non-optimal placement of the count updates; >> * A third factor is related value profiling (to be turned on in the >> future). Small and hot callee functions taking function pointer (callbacks) >> can incur overhead due to indirect call target profiling. >> >> >> 1.1 Redundant Counter Update >> >> If checking the assembly of the...

...lement late binding technique. In Ruby on Rails, is there any implementation of late binding technique?if have, can you elaborate more about late binding(eg:give any example in Ruby on Rails)? what type of database is needed?,which programming languages is suitable?, or any other requirement that related to the late binding implementation.thank you.. best regards, Fitri Sinan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060401/d10ffdfb/attachment.html

*** Call for Late-breaking Posters *** Abstracts may be submitted for posters presenting recent developments and late-breaking applications of R, on topics as indicated in the earlier call for abstracts: http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/UseR-2012#Call_for_Abstracts_and_Tutorial Late-breaking posters will be displayed during the poster session alongside regular posters, and they will appear

Hi, I think these two patches are related to the topic: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41578 “[SCEV] Do not cache S -> V if S is not equivalent of V” * It’s committed. It can cause generation of redundant instructions. We’ve got regressions due to it. The biggest one is 7.31% regression in Spec2k6 401.bzip2 on Cortex-A57(AArch64). htt...

I’m River and I’m a compiler engineer at PlayStation. Recently, I’ve been working on an interprocedural outlining (code folding) pass for code size improvement at the IR level. We hit a couple of use cases that the current code size solutions didn’t handle well enough. Outlining is one of the avenues that seemed potentially beneficial. -- Algorithmic Approach -- The general implementation can be

Hi all, I have deployed my Ruby On Rails application on TextDrive. At first everything seamed to be fine. However, lately, response time of my application is incredible slow. Worse, lately there is also a lot of downtime. I have contacted their support desk, however, they do not respond (at all, or very, very late). Has anyone else these experiences with TextDrive? And if so, what did you do

...ers, ctors/dtors etc). > >>> Overhead of instrumenting those small functions can be very large, > making > >>> training runs too slow and in some cases to usable; > >>> * Non-optimal placement of the count updates; > >>> * A third factor is related value profiling (to be turned on in the > >>> future). Small and hot callee functions taking function pointer > (callbacks) > >>> can incur overhead due to indirect call target profiling. > >>> > >>> > >>> 1.1 Redundant Counter Update...

Hi Evgeny, I know of the current machine outliner in LLVM. If you look in the "More detailed performance data" in the end section it includes performance comparisons to the machine outliner. As for the algorithmic approach they are kind of similar. Machine Outliner: - Builds a suffix tree based on identical equivalence between machine instrs. - Uses target specific cost model for

Hi, I've been running tinc for a couple of months and it's great, but I have a periodic problem which maybe you guys can figure out. I operate a 3-node tinc VPN, lets say A, B and C. A / \ B --- C The problem is that after a while, node C can't exchange data with node B. It works fine (ping and other traffic) for about 10 minutes, then fails. Here is some debug

...lready happened in August last year, there was a concern about different no-wrap flags that come from different sequences of SCEV flags invocations. It was mentioned there that late setting of flags is actually a hack to save some compile time. Recently I've stumbled over a different problem related to this late flag setting. The problem is that current SCEV implementation caches a lot of data about SCEVs. In particular, information about ranges and loop backedge taken counts. A side effect of that is that if we had an AddRec like {1,+,1} and cached its range as [MIN_INT, MAX_INT+1), and then...

I get a lot of these in my log, especially when I am moving lots of traffic across the vpn: Sep 20 10:45:11 titan tinc.tdvpns[16152]: Got late or replayed packet from holden (xx.yy.zz.ww port 655), seqno 37609, last received 37610 (sequence numbers displayed generally differ by only one) What exactly is this trying to say? Surely this doesn't simply mean that the udp packets arrived in a

Lately I''ve seen a lot of Internet Server Errors while trying to use Trac. Is there a plan to do something about this, or is it time to start sending donations for a new server? ;) Kind regards, Thijs -- Fingertips - http://www.fngtps.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

[+ some folks more knowledgable about the Machine layer than me.] > On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:07 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at rt-rk.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am one of the authors of this feature. On Phabricator, we agreed to > take discussion whether encoding this in IR and threading it through the > compiler or performing a late MIR analysis is the better approach.

Hi, When using lapic as timer source the hypervisor delivers timer interrupts late. In the source xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c function create_periodic_time creates a timer element with a "bonus" of 50% of the desired time until the interrupt: pt->scheduled = NOW() + period; /* * Offset LAPIC ticks from other timer ticks. Otherwise guests which use * LAPIC ticks for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728 Summary: Rsync --min-size and --max-size filter too late in the process. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, [+ Quentin] Sorry for the late reply. > On Feb 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at rt-rk.com> wrote: > > On 12.02.2019. 18:06, Adrian Prantl wrote: >> [+ some folks more knowledgable about the Machine layer than me.] >> > That would be useful for us too! :) > > >>> On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:07 AM, Nikola Prica <nikola.prica at

...to the Intel proposal, which effectively translates OpenMP pragmas directly into llvm intrinsics + metadata. I can't imagine a way to make this work *correctly* without massive changes to the optimizer. > > There are three ways to make this work correctly: > > 1) Ignore OpenMP-related intrinsics and associated metadata. Least > effort, least benefit (no OpenMP support). This is trivially true, but the entire point of supporting OpenMP in the IR would be to have some sort of late "procedurization" pass that actually exposes the parallelism through some runtime. S...

...t last year, there was a concern > about different no-wrap flags that come from different sequences of SCEV > flags invocations. It was mentioned there that late setting of flags is > actually a hack to save some compile time. > > Recently I've stumbled over a different problem related to this late flag > setting. The problem is that current SCEV implementation caches a lot of > data about SCEVs. In particular, information about ranges and loop backedge > taken counts. A side effect of that is that if we had an AddRec like {1,+,1} > and cached its range as [MIN_INT, M...