search for: lastus

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "lastus".

Did you mean: lasts
2004 Dec 30
19
OpenVPN tun Interface
I have a zone "rw" defined as tun0 in interfaces. From that zone, pings to zone "loc" succeed but pings to remote networks (On IPsec VPNs) are rejected in the all2all chain. From my point of view, these pings should be in the rw2cctc chain. (rw to cctc is ACCEPTed in policy.) I must have a hole in my config, where would it be? Thanks, A.
2008 Jan 22
10
IPSEC VPN to VPN firewalling problem
Dear Shorewall Users :-) I''ve been playing with shorewall for some time now - I found it really interesting and easy tool to organise all the rules and so on (beforethat I''ve been using simple iptables rules in shell script ;-) Generally it''s quite easy to be used, but anyway found one problem which I cannot handle myself - or in other words - cannot find appropriate
2014 Nov 25
2
CentOS-5.10 Sendmail STARTTLS error
...1 Time(s) MCI at 0x8055b34: flags=27c86c<CACHED,ESMTP,SIZE,8BITMIME,DSN,INMIME,AUTH,AUTHACT,ENHSTAT,PIPELINED,TLSACT>, errno=32, herrno=0, exitstat=75, state=8, pid=0, maxsize=20480000, phase=client DATA 354, mailer=esmtp, status=4.4.2, rstatus=(null), host=inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca., lastuse=Mon Nov 24 10:56:35 2014\n: 1 Time(s) MCI at 0x8053aa4: flags=27c86c<CACHED,ESMTP,SIZE,8BITMIME,DSN,INMIME,AUTH,AUTHACT,ENHSTAT,PIPELINED,TLSACT>, errno=32, herrno=0, exitstat=75, state=8, pid=0, maxsize=20480000, phase=client DATA 354, mailer=esmtp, status=4.4.2, rstatus=(null), host=in...
2012 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Lang, I think I am getting closer to understanding this. The findLastUseBefore() should probably look something like this: // Return the last use of reg between NewIdx and OldIdx. SlotIndex findLastUseBefore(unsigned Reg, SlotIndex OldIdx) { SlotIndex LastUse = NewIdx; if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { for (MCRegUnitRootItera...
2007 Sep 03
3
Shorewall + IPSec: help debugging why gw1<->gw2 SA works, but loc<->gw2 traffic doesn't trigger SA
...hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes) > allocated: 15 hard: 0 soft: 0 > sadb_seq=0 pid=4820 refcnt=0 > > # setkey -DP > 192.168.3.0/24[any] 1.2.3.4[any] any > in prio def ipsec > esp/tunnel/5.6.7.8-1.2.3.4/require > created: Sep 3 17:11:49 2007 lastused: > lifetime: 0(s) validtime: 0(s) > spid=2184 seq=1 pid=4821 > refcnt=1 > 1.2.3.4[any] 5.6.7.8[any] any > in prio def ipsec > esp/tunnel/1.2.3.4-5.6.7.8/require > created: Sep 3 17:11:49 2007 lastused: Sep 3 17:55:24 2007 > life...
2005 Feb 05
13
Problem while trying to set up an ipsec vpn
Hi, I''m asking my question here, because I could not find any answer to my problem, but I''m affraid shorewall is not the one to blame. First of all I''m using shorewall version 2.0.15 on two linux box. I set up an ipsec tunnel beetween those 2 boxes to be ables to connect 2 not routable subnetworks. Here is my network topology: 10.66.17.0/24 - 10.66.17.1 = eth0
2006 Oct 25
0
Logwatch sendmail errors... What does it mean ?
.../gid=0/51, size=1632: 2 Time(s) MCI at 0x92dfa44: flags=7c86c<CACHED,ESMTP,SIZE,8BITMIME,DSN,INMIME,AUTH,AUTHACT,ENHSTAT,PIPELINED>, errno=32, herrno=0, exitstat=75, state=8, pid=0, maxsize=8192000, phase=client DATA 354, mailer=esmtp, status=4.4.2, rstatus=(null), host=poczta.orange.pl., lastuse=Tue Oct 24 22:13:37 2006\n: 1 Time(s) 10: fl=0x8000, mode=100640: dev=3/1, ino=11748385, nlink=1, u/gid=0/51, size=12288: 1 Time(s) 9: fl=0x802, mode=140777: SOCK xxx.tld/42800->(Transport endpoint is not connected): 1 Time(s) 14: fl=0x8000, mode=100640: dev=3/1, ino=11748387, n...
2012 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Hi Lang, Just one more quick question. in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp In SlotIndex findLastUseBefore(unsigned Reg, SlotIndex OldIdx) Did you really mean to use for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_nodbg_iterator UI = MRI.use_nodbg_begin(Reg), UE = MRI.use_nodbg_end(); UI != UE; UI.skipInstruction()) {} Aren't we currently dealing with units, not...
2012 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Hi Sergei, I just fixed the broken test case for PR13719 with r163107, but from the debugging output you've posted it suspect it won't fix your test case. Your analysis looks good - findLastUseBefore(..) doesn't appear to be handling physregs. I'm surprised that isn't causing more failures. I'll see if I can find a failing case in the LLVM test-suite (it's been a while since I ran live-interval-update over all of it) and try out your modifications to findLastUseBefore...
2014 Nov 25
0
CentOS-5.10 Sendmail STARTTLS error
...0x8055b34: > flags=27c86c<CACHED,ESMTP,SIZE,8BITMIME,DSN,INMIME,AUTH,AUTHACT,ENHSTAT,PIPELINED,TLSACT>, > errno=32, herrno=0, exitstat=75, state=8, pid=0, maxsize=20480000, phase=client > DATA 354, mailer=esmtp, status=4.4.2, rstatus=(null), > host=inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca., lastuse=Mon Nov 24 10:56:35 2014\n: 1 > Time(s) > MCI at 0x8053aa4: > flags=27c86c<CACHED,ESMTP,SIZE,8BITMIME,DSN,INMIME,AUTH,AUTHACT,ENHSTAT,PIPELINED,TLSACT>, > errno=32, herrno=0, exitstat=75, state=8, pid=0, maxsize=20480000, phase=client > DATA 354, mailer=esmtp, status=4.4....
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] PassManager Woes
"Daniel Stewart" <stewartd at codeaurora.org> writes: > I'm no expert on the PassManager, but I happen to be going through it > fairly carefully right now. You didn't state which passes were Module > Passes and which were Function Passes (or other types). Sorry, I did mean to include that. They are all FunctionPasses. > One thing I have noticed is that
2000 May 10
0
patche for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c
...BOOL conn_idle_all(time_t t, int deadtime) { - BOOL allidle = True; - connection_struct *conn, *next; + BOOL allidle = True; + int i, num_passed; - for (conn=Connections;conn;conn=next) { - next=conn->next; - /* close dirptrs on connections that are idle */ - if ((t-conn->lastused) > DPTR_IDLE_TIMEOUT) - dptr_idlecnum(conn); - - if (conn->num_files_open > 0 || - (t-conn->lastused)<deadtime) - allidle = False; - } + for ( num_passed = 0, i = 0; i < MAX_CONNECTIONS; i++ ) { + if ( cth.Connections[i] ) { + connection_struct *c...
2006 Mar 07
1
PLEASE HELP ,a2billing problem with call duration
...#39;1', '1', '051359687' )] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CC_asterisk_stop 1.1: SQL: DONE] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CC_asterisk_stop 1.2: SQL: UPDATE cc_card SET credit= credit-12.516666666667, redial='00436642780018', lastuse=now(), nbused=nbused+1 WHERE username='0474'] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[callingcard_acct_stop] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CHANNEL STATUS : 6 = Line is up] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CREDIT STATUS : 68.6500333...
2014 Apr 21
3
[LLVMdev] PassManager Woes
...el Stewart" <stewartd at codeaurora.org> writes: > You haven't mentioned if your passes are implementers of an interface > (like AliasAnalysis). No, they're just regular FunctionPasses. > What seems to matter as far as having a pass free'd from memory are > the LastUsers. The LastUsers are set by required passes. So if a pass > says it requires another pass, the required pass sticks around. The > last user is the last pass that required some other particular pass. > It appears in your case that F requires A and C. The PassManager will > indicate that...
2006 Mar 07
0
a2billing problem with call duration
...#39;1', '1', '051359687' )] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CC_asterisk_stop 1.1: SQL: DONE] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CC_asterisk_stop 1.2: SQL: UPDATE cc_card SET credit= credit-12.516666666667, redial='00436642780018', lastuse=now(), nbused=nbused+1 WHERE username='0474'] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[callingcard_acct_stop] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CHANNEL STATUS : 6 = Line is up] [05/03/2006 19:52:37]:[CallerID:051359687]:[CN:0474]:[CREDIT STATUS : 68.6500333...
2005 Apr 27
5
26sec kame ipsec tunnel : packets leave unencrypted...
...8.1.0/24 -|A|- 62.212.109.16 <--- INTERNET ---> 82.234.240.117 -|B|- 192.168.0.0/24 On "B", setkey -DP gives the following: 192.168.0.0/24[any] 192.168.1.0/24[any] any out ipsec esp/tunnel/82.234.240.117-62.212.109.16/require created: Apr 27 12:18:35 2005 lastused: lifetime: 0(s) validtime: 0(s) spid=313 seq=5 pid=5812 refcnt=1 When I try to ping the A router from the B router (using 192.168. addresses of course), packets are sent unencrypted. And I can''t figure out why. Does anyone have an idea? I''ve already se...
2016 May 25
0
PassManager insights?
...insert removal in that function, other stuff breaks, so I'm led to believe that the removeNotPreservedAnalysis() isn't meant to go that deep, and instead just clean up some map. Perhaps the CallGraph should be removed a bit later in removeDeadPasses() instead? But it is not in the relevant lastuse-map. Perhaps that's the bug? Or something else entirely. If find the PassManagers a bit hard to get a good grip of, so any help and insights would be greatly appreciated! BR, Jesper -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipe...
2017 Jun 29
1
samba-tool SIGSEGV
...tec.com.au" (ldapsam) Found pdb backend ldapsam pdb backend ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap.motec.com.au" has a valid init Opening cache file at /var/lib/samba/login_cache.tdb init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: user1 ---8<---*snip*---8<--- init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: lastuser Next rid = 13001 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. lpcfg_tls_verify_peer (lp_ctx=0x0) at default/lib/param/param_functions.c:355 355 FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(tls_verify_peer, tls_verify_peer) (gdb) Any help appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Adm...
2012 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Hi Sergei, Andy, Sorry - I got distracted with some other work. I'm looking into this and PR13719 now. I'll let you know what I find out. Sergei - thanks very much for the investigation. That should help me pin this down. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Andy, Lang, > > Thanks for the suggestion. >
2012 Aug 28
5
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Andy, Lang, Thanks for the suggestion. I have spent more time with it today, and I do see some strange things in liveness update. I am not at the actual cause yet, but here is what I got so far: I have the following live ranges when I start scheduling a region: R2 = [0B,48r:0)[352r,416r:5)... R3 = [0B,48r:0)[368r,416r:5)... R4 = [0B,32r:0)[384r,416r:4)... R5 = [0B,32r:0)[400r,416r:4)...