search for: last_port

...maybe this code in test-exec.sh: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else PORT=4242 fi could be something similar to: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else first_port=4200 last_port=4300 test_port=$first_port while [ "$test_port" -le "$last_port" ]; do netstat -na | grep "[:.]$test_port " >/dev/null 2>&1 || { PORT=$test_port; break; } test_port=`expr $test_port + 1` done if [ -z "$PORT" ]; th...

...ormative. Maybe the code in test-exec.sh: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else PORT=4242 fi could be something similar to: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else first_port=4200 last_port=4300 test_port=$first_port while [ "$test_port" -le "$last_port" ]; do netstat -na | grep "[:.]$test_port " >/dev/null 2>&1 || { PORT=$test_port; break; } test_port=`expr $test_port + 1` done if [ -z "$PORT" ]; then...

On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote: > On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered): >> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running >>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud > > I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when > there is an issue in the MTA, our