search for: last_emitted

...fence.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c > @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); > > + if (!wake && last_seq < last_emitted) > + schedule_delayed_work(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].work, jiffies_to_msecs(10)); > + > When trying this: if (seq < last_emitted) is probably a better check. ~Maarten

Am 23.07.2014 12:52, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Christian K?nig > <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote: >>> And the dma-buf would still have fences belonging to both drivers, and it >>> would still call from outside the driver. >> >> Calling from outside the driver is fine as long as the driver can do >> everything

...ed with - * - * Checks the current fence value and wakes the fence queue - * if the sequence number has increased (all asics). - */ -void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,7 +181,51 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) + if (seq < last_emitted) + mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, + &amp...

...nt fence value and wakes the fence queue > - * if the sequence number has increased (all asics). > - */ > -void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > { > uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; > unsigned count_loop = 0; > @@ -190,7 +181,51 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); > > - if (wake) > + if (seq < last_emitted) > + mod_delaye...

...drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); + if (!wake && last_seq < last_emitted) + schedule_delayed_work(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].work, jiffies_to_msecs(10)); + return wake; } @@ -815,6 +818,14 @@ int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) return 0; } +static void radeon_fence_driver_recheck(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ra...

...t; &fence->fence_wake); > + fence_put(&fence->base); > + } else > + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > { > uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; > unsigned count_loop = 0; > @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device > *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > > seq); > > - if (wake) > - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue)...

...wait_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake); + fence_put(&fence->base); + } else + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); + return 0; +} + +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); + return wake; } /** - * radeon_fence_...

...wait_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake); + fence_put(&fence->base); + } else + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); + return 0; +} + +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); + return wake; } /** - * radeon_fence_...

...wait_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake); + fence_put(&fence->base); + } else + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); + return 0; +} + +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); + return wake; } /** - * radeon_fence_...

...&fence->fence_wake); > + fence_put(&fence->base); > + } else > + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > { > uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; > unsigned count_loop = 0; > @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); > > - if (wake) > - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); &gt...

Am 19.05.2014 15:35, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 19-05-14 14:30, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 19.05.2014 12:10, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 19-05-14 10:27, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> [SNIP] >>>> The problem here is that the whole approach collides with the way >>>>

...it_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake); + fence_put(&fence->base); + } else + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); + return 0; +} + +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); + return wake; } /** - * radeon...

...ce_wake); > + fence_put(&fence->base); > + } else > + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > { > uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; > unsigned count_loop = 0; > @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device > *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); > > - if (wake) > - wake_up_all(&rdev-...

fence_is_signaled callback should support being run in atomic context, but not in irq context. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- include/linux/fence.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h index d174585b874b..c1a4519ba2f5 100644 ---

Am 19.05.2014 10:00, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 15-05-14 18:13, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 15.05.2014 17:58, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 15-05-14 17:48, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> Am 15.05.2014 16:18, schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>>> op 15-05-14 15:19, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> Am 15.05.2014 15:04, schrieb

...it_queue(&fence->rdev->fence_queue, &fence->fence_wake); + fence_put(&fence->base); + } else + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); + return 0; +} + +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; unsigned count_loop = 0; @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) } } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); - if (wake) - wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue); + return wake; } /** - * radeon...

...ce_wake); > + fence_put(&fence->base); > + } else > + FENCE_TRACE(&fence->base, "pending\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static bool __radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) > { > uint64_t seq, last_seq, last_emitted; > unsigned count_loop = 0; > @@ -190,23 +224,22 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device > *rdev, int ring) > } > } while (atomic64_xchg(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq, seq) > seq); > > - if (wake) > - wake_up_all(&rdev-...

This series depends on the previously posted reservation api patches. 2 of them are not yet in for-next-fences branch of git://git.linaro.org/people/sumit.semwal/linux-3.x.git The missing patches are still in my vmwgfx_wip branch at git://people.freedesktop.org/~mlankhorst/linux All ttm drivers are converted to the fence api, fence_lock is removed and rcu is used in its place. qxl is the first

This series applies on top of the driver-core-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git Before converting ttm to the new fence interface I had to fix some drivers to require a reservation before poking with fence_obj. After flipping the switch RCU becomes available instead, and the extra reservations can be dropped again. :-) I've done at least basic