search for: largefile

Hello, I'm facing a problem syncing files which is over 2GB size, eventhough i searched the archives and it been mentioned its possible if largefiles option is enabled, but still its giving me problems. i.e: building file list ... readlink dir1/oracle_data1.tar: Value too large for defined data type readlink dir1/oracle_data2.tar: Value too large for defined data type readlink dir1/oracle_data3.tar: Value too large for defined data type # du -...

...e: > Would anyone who is seeing this problem please try out the patch that is > attached to this bugzilla bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536 I gave it a test and it seems to work fine on HPUX 11.0. It skips the problematic mkstemp() call. It also passed the largefiles test that I sent to the list recently. -- Steve

Hello, currently we're using version 1.0.13 with 32bit file offsets. Is it safe to switch to a new version with largefile support enabled ? We want to reuse existing index/cache or do we have to expect errors with that ? Regards. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum 00-006, 79110 Freiburg, Ge...

Hi, I tried to compile rsync-2.5.2 on Solaris 5.7 Ultra-2 machine, 5.7 on Ultra-2 is running 64 bit, but, when I ran configure, it said no for largefile, I thought 2.5.2 will support large file? Is that true? Thanks, Jennifer

...------------------------------------- <GMT27-Apr-2006 20:27:29GMT> Darrin Bodner: Summary: Large files (on the order of 1GB) are sometimes (~50%) corrupted when transferred by using sftp on a new macbookpro (mac os x/intel arch) Steps to Reproduce: Enable sshd. $ sftp localhost > > get largefile largefile.copy $ md5 largefile $ md5 largefile.copy The results usually differ. Using diff(1) confirms this is not a bug with md5. Subsequent transfers can have the correct checksum or different incorrect checksums, suggesting the corruption does not always happen in the same place. sftp'ing a...

Author: eschrock Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e5f70a6fc5010aa205f244a25a9cdb950e0dae89 Log message: 6366222 zdb(1M) needs to use largefile primitives when reading label 6366267 zfs broke non-BUILD64 compilation of libsec Files: update: usr/src/cmd/zdb/zdb.c update: usr/src/lib/libsec/Makefile

Author: jkennedy Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 931f9f0e5d2fb0b5da5bc6c0f77c10e668f842cf Log message: 4775289 fsck reports wrong state in superblock if there once has existed a largefile 6302747 Performance regression when deleting large files from a logging ufs filesystem 6362734 df output corrupt after under heavy stress Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/fsck/utilities.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/lufs_map.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/ufs/ufs_thread.c

I have downloaded the source for rsync 2.5.6 and compiled it without adjusting any options, no problems. Performed a test copy of a file GT 2 GB and it failed. In the file configure I changed the line to "--enable-largefile", removed all the .o files, performed a ./configure, gmake, gmake install. Tried the test copy and again received the following error message: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 32768 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (cod...

Hi all, I notice a big throughput differences between a normal user and root on Dom-0. I did the command scp largefile root@xx.yyy.zzz.sss:~ and got the following result (test is a normal user): >From Dom-0 to Dom-1 Login root --> largefile 100% 4096MB 8.5MB/s 08:01 Login test --> largefile 100% 4096MB 2.9MB/s 23:46 <--??? >From Dom-1 to Dom-0 Login root --> largefile 100% 4096MB...

A while back someone posted a patch for scp that updates it to deal with files > 2gb by using 64 bit offsets as defined by LFS (Large File Sumit). I belive the patch was tested on Linux but maybe not on other systems that support largefiles. I've tried this under Solaris and scp fails with a broken pipe on only the second write to the pipe between scp and ssh if the file is over 2gb. If the file is under 2gb it works fine. it fails the second time around the for loop that looks like this in scp.c:source() for (haderr = i = 0;...

...temp() if HP-UX were ever fixed (HA!) This may falsely fail if the current filesystem doesn't allow for large files (common on HP systems) and if the system doesn't support sparse files this test could fill up the filesystem. 4) Implement HP's suggested workaround of a fcntl() to set O_LARGEFILE on the file handle returned by mkstemp() inside syscall.c. This is essentially non-portable and indeed won't even work on HP-UX if building a 64-bit binary. 5) Document the workarounds for HP-UX in the INSTALL file (e.g. comment out HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP in config.h after running "configure...

I'm attempting to decode part of a largefile flac whose seektable is broken or missing and the file is shorter then it's supposed to be, when I use 1.1.2 it decodes fine, when I use 1.1.3 it fails flac --decode --skip=719:58.0 --until=1024:58.0 -o \/home\/sbh\/work\/hs\/out.wav \/mnt\/ss\/sdb\/Sound\/Recording\/2006\-11\-29\/in.flac out...

I'm attempting to decode part of a largefile flac whose seektable is broken or missing and the file is shorter then it's supposed to be, when I use 1.1.2 it decodes fine, when I use 1.1.3 it fails flac --decode --skip=719:58.0 --until=1024:58.0 -o \/home\/sbh\/work\/hs\/out.wav \/mnt\/ss\/sdb\/Sound\/Recording\/2006\-11\-29\/in.flac out...

Full_Name: John Brzustowski Version: R-devel-trunk, R-2.4.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (206.248.132.197) DESCRIPTION seek() on files larger than 2 gigabytes fails for large values of "where" on i386 linux 2.6.13 (and presumably other 32-bit unix-like platforms). e.g.: > f<-file("3gigabytefile.dat", "rb") > seek(f, 3e9, "start",

...NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool01 123K 5.33T 42.0K /zpool01 filer01a:/$ df -h /zpool01 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on zpool01 5.4T 42K 5.4T 1% /zpool01 filer01a:/$ mkfile 1024G /zpool01/largefile ^C filer01a:/$ zfs list zpool01 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool01 160G 5.17T 160G /zpool01 filer01a:/$ ls -hl /zpool01/largefile -rw-...

Hi, I am running RH 7.2 (professional release 2.4 kernel) I have a ext3 file system which stores large oracle "dump files" over 4GB. We write to it via NFS which is working great, the problem is when we issue a file largefile.dmp from the linux box it fails on anything over 4GB stating that can't stat 'largefile.dmp' (value too large for defined data type). We can do the same command on the NFS mount on an HP 11.0 server and it works fine. We have "journaling" turned on , what are we missing on t...

On 12/11/06, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm attempting to decode part of a largefile flac whose seektable is > > broken or missing and the file is shorter then it's supposed to be, > > when I use 1.1.2 it decodes fine, when I use 1.1.3 it fails > > > > flac --decode --skip=719:58.0 --until=1024:58.0 -o > > \/home\/sbh\/work\/hs\/out.wav > > \...

...d: building file list ... done wrote 114 bytes read 20 bytes 3.01 bytes/sec total size is 1383275520 speedup is 10322951.64 I've tried with other big files and rsync strip them to the same size, so I recompiled rsync to support large files support but I failed again: sh ./configure --enable-largefile --prefix=/usr In the output you can see: checking for broken largefile support... no checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no $ rsync --versi...

[I'm not online regularly, so don't include me in any replies. Looks like the archives are working at present, so I'll catch up from them when I get a chance. Thanks...] (Trying out vorbis-dev@ instead of vorbis@ where I sent my previous messages; if this is the wrong place, correct me) Greetings. Some weeks ago, I submitted several hacks which gave me the ability to play Ogg

Hi, A bug I've had reported is that scp doesn't work with large files (Debian bug number 106809). The problem seems to be scp.c:504: if ((fd = open(name, O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) Is there some reason why making that if ((fd = open(name, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE, 0)) < 0) would break things? It seems a simple fix to me... Thanks, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org