search for: large_problem_size

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "large_problem_size".

2009 Dec 24
2
[LLVMdev] Problem in External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/Makefile ?
...m -------------- next part -------------- Index: External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/Makefile =================================================================== --- External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/Makefile (revision 92115) +++ External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/Makefile (working copy) @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ ifdef LARGE_PROBLEM_SIZE RUN_OPTIONS := -frames 500 else -RUN_OPTIONS := -frames 100 +RUN_OPTIONS := -frames 10 endif RUN_OPTIONS += -meshfile mesa.in -ppmfile mesa.ppm
2009 Dec 24
0
[LLVMdev] Problem in External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/Makefile ?
...; Is my version of spec wrong ? What you say is true in the version I have. > If not, can we apply the attached patch ? I don't think it's ideal. There are 3 input sets, not 2, that's the root of the problem: ifndef RUN_TYPE ifdef SMALL_PROBLEM_SIZE RUN_TYPE := test else ifdef LARGE_PROBLEM_SIZE RUN_TYPE := ref else RUN_TYPE := train endif endif endif 100 is a fine value for "train". I think it's better to test both variables in the mesa Makefile. (IMO controlling a ternary variable with 2 booleans is not the right way to do it, btw.) > Thanks, > Julien > &gt...
2009 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Parallelized make check
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:26:02AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:24:17PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: > >> I haven't tested with objdir != srcdir. > > > > Ok, that was broken. Attached is a smaller diff that should work in > > all > > cases. > > This
2009 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Parallelized make check
...false; fi Index: utils/NewNightlyTest.pl =================================================================== --- utils/NewNightlyTest.pl (revision 65468) +++ utils/NewNightlyTest.pl (working copy) @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ # -norunningtests Do not run the Olden benchmark suite with # LARGE_PROBLEM_SIZE enabled. # -nodejagnu Do not run feature or regression tests +# -jcheck Use the jcheck target instead of check to run dejagnu tests. # -parallel Run two parallel jobs with GNU Make. # -release Build an LLVM Release version # -release-asserts Build an LLVM Rele...
2009 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Parallelized make check
On Feb 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:24:17PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: >> I haven't tested with objdir != srcdir. > > Ok, that was broken. Attached is a smaller diff that should work in > all > cases. This sounds really cool Julien! Two questions: 1) does it preserve the checking that the existing tcl stuff does, which