search for: large_off_t

The following patches shave some rough edges off the tools build system to allow cross compiling for at least arm32 and arm64 based on the Debian/Ubuntu multiarch infrastructure. They also add the necessary fixes to build for arm64 (which I have only tried cross, not native). I have posted some instructions on how to compile with these patches on the wiki:

...Eggert <eggert at twinsun.com>. + +dnl Internal subroutine of AC_SYS_LARGEFILE. +dnl AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_TEST_INCLUDES +AC_DEFUN(AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_TEST_INCLUDES, + [[#include <sys/types.h> + /* Check that off_t can represent 2**63 - 1 correctly. + We can't simply "#define LARGE_OFF_T 9223372036854775807", + since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers + incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ +# define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) + int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 + && LARGE_O...

...1 | #define HAVE_SOCKETPAIR 1 | #define SOCKLEN_T socklen_t | #define HAVE_FSYNC 1 | #define HAVE_PREAD 1 | #define HAVE_PWRITE 1 | #define HAVE_LINK 1 | /* end confdefs.h. */ | #include <sys/types.h> | /* Check that off_t can represent 2**63 - 1 correctly. | We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, | since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers | incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ | #define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) | int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 | && LARGE_O...